NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
StuDogg101 wrote:I am loathe to trade Holland, but considering I started with Sele/Sivo/Garrick I feel like I'm going to be behind the 8 ball when it comes to cash making if I don't bring in at least one of the better cashies.
Welshy wrote:
This is my issue, only dud scorers were Radley, Holland, Tedesco, Edwards. Who i'll likely keep
Sivo + Garrick were R1 duds, but base so not making any cash there. I will probably have to downgrade Holland/Radley to kick start some money making against what I want to do
Teeth Eater wrote:I discussed earlier bringing Lawrie in for Hethrington, which is locked in.
Just thinking if I need to do Kahu to Host too, or just leave it at one trade this week? Or I could probably even do Kahu to Bird. But is Kahu worth holding for at least a few more weeks? I tend to think so.
Teeth Eater wrote:
I prefer B too, though I’m not so sure about any of them to be honest, if it means moving Glasby on. I’d have thought he be worth keeping around for a while?
Other then Sivo and Garrick who won’t make any money, I have Edwards and Holland who dudded this week, don’t really want to downgrade either of them. If bird can keep up 35’s I am happy to downgrade holland to bird for some cash, move Burns to WFB and trade Edwards to Bateman in the centres with 134K itb? Thoughts?Welshy wrote:
This is my issue, only dud scorers were Radley, Holland, Tedesco, Edwards. Who i'll likely keep
Sivo + Garrick were R1 duds, but base so not making any cash there. I will probably have to downgrade Holland/Radley to kick start some money making against what I want to do
Individual wrote:can u reverse trades .. if u hav no trades left
Rapture_NRL wrote:Any advice on these trades:
Glasby -> Lawrie
Sivo -> Bird
$248k left
Glasby -> Lawrie
Holland -> Bateman (or Gillett)
$176k left
Glasby -> Fifita
Macca -> $232k player
$0k left
Leaning towards A.. means I forgo some decent players though
StormTrooper96 wrote:
Other then Sivo and Garrick who won’t make any money, I have Edwards and Holland who dudded this week, don’t really want to downgrade either of them. If bird can keep up 35’s I am happy to downgrade holland to bird for some cash, move Burns to WFB and trade Edwards to Bateman in the centres with 134K itb? Thoughts?
Pretty much
Holland + Edwards (94k itb)
Trade for
Bird + Bateman (134k itb)
Gives me cash generation and points
EDIt: only thing is garrick and Sivo stink up my NPR’s for another week
SpotTheOzzie wrote:The boys usually put up the BE's? Anyone know where it is?
ForanAgainst wrote:
Page 44
SpotTheOzzie wrote:The boys usually put up the BE's? Anyone know where it is?
WT2K wrote:Twal and Garrick out for Lawrie and one of (B)Smith/Host will be my trades this week.
ForanAgainst wrote:Good evening, everyone. No one here knows who I am, mainly because I don’t spend much time here. I probably haven’t post in over the better part of a year, but part of me feels I should be more of a contributor around here. I make time for other parts of my day, so why not an hour or so here?
With that introduction complete, here is where my team, Wontonamo Baygulls, sits after one round. My current ranking is 1464 after a score of 914. My team is as follows:
Cook
Tolman, Fifita
Taupau, Murray, Gillett
Keighran, Morgan
Holland, Nikora
CNK, Kahu, Burns
Lane, Mahoney, Garner, Capewell
Bird, Brown, Tatola, Rava
I don’t see any major adjustments that need to be made. Someone mentioned a possible trade I’m also considering, and that is Tatola>Lawrie. I’m close to pulling the trigger on this one, just need to, as always, weigh the pros and cons of this decision.
StormTrooper96 wrote:A) Holland and Edwards for Bird and Bateman (134k)
B) Holland for Bird/Lawrie (204k/213k)
C) Holland and Garrick for Bird and Lawrie (102K)
D) no trade
Thoughts?
Home