Mulvy wrote:
Huh? Led the competition for try assists and line break assists.
If Slater would play this year, he would still kill it as well, but there is a right time to put the boots down.
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
Mulvy wrote:
Huh? Led the competition for try assists and line break assists.
Mulvy wrote:Rabbit wrote:
Shit, Id beg for a new avatar if I had that one
That's not very nice, it's Churg-Strauss syndrome and there's nothing he can do about it.
If you have the C on him you get 6 times the points.filthridden wrote:NRL.com team lists. - can someone screenshot and post the Sharks.
It's got Shaun Johnson in there three times. I would recommend trading him in if they've cloned him because no way failhub will be able to figure that out with their system and surely he'll score at least 3x 30!
Milchy wrote:
Hey fanatics.
I know at 6pm tonight most of you are going to be super keen on watching John Bateman tear it up for Canberra. But if anyone is looking for alternative entertainment, tune in to the game show 'Pointless' on channel 10, where you will be able to see yours truly in action.
You'll also be able to watch it on the interwebz on tenplay afterwards. (well, SI might struggle to do this, but everyone else should be OK)
I hate fucking spiders, no way I’m going intawebs.Milchy wrote:
Hey fanatics.
I know at 6pm tonight most of you are going to be super keen on watching John Bateman tear it up for Canberra. But if anyone is looking for alternative entertainment, tune in to the game show 'Pointless' on channel 10, where you will be able to see yours truly in action.
You'll also be able to watch it on the interwebz on tenplay afterwards. (well, SI might struggle to do this, but everyone else should be OK)
Random.Khany wrote:Getting the feeling a few of our favs have continued 1 yr too long. Gal,GI,CS9 etc
Randoms only 12, hes just getting startedSI wrote:
Random.
SI wrote:
Random.
Milchy wrote:
On fantasy matters
The only research I have done today is on Holland vs Bateman.
I have come to the conclusion that Batemen needs to average over 50 over the next month for him to be worth bringing in now.
If you think that will happen, and Holland averages no more than 40 its probably worth it. Its relatively cash neutral, but you get a big points win.
If Batemen goes less than 50, and/or Holland gets much more than 40, then you are probably OK to hold Holland.
Finch wrote:Not to sound like a dick but... I don't come to this thread to know about a TV show I wont be watching.
Just Saying.
(Please don't hate me)
That shirt is so bloody goodMilchy wrote:
I was a bit concerned how quickly Chewie dragged up that link. Then I bloody clicked on it
Here is me from a few years ago on a VICE documentary about data collection in the NRL
https://sports.vice.com/en_au/article/nza37w/gps-in-the-nrl-how-wearable-tech-is-making-australias-toughest-sport-smarter
There was a similar AFL one made around the same time
https://sports.vice.com/en_au/article/mg83jy/analytics-in-the-afl-the-most-data-rich-sport-on-earth
Quite interesting as it shows you the process that they go through recording stats at the game.
Milchy wrote:
With Host and Lawrie having played already, and Bateman about to take the field, there's nothing to talk about fantasy wise for a while
If you need to add please don’t hate me to a post you must realise that you’re being a dick. Just pull your head in. Ok?Finch wrote:Not to sound like a dick but... I don't come to this thread to know about a TV show I wont be watching.
Just Saying.
(Please don't hate me)