NRL Fantasy 2019 Part 69

my tv broke wrote:Haha thats a shocker. That wasnt late. Comms blowing uo about it is ridiculous

I know right? I thought maybe it's the Devil's cut or something. It was a split second wasn't it????!!!!!

Fox comms all calling for the sin bin. It was late but wasnt high, penalty would have been sufficient. The Dogs player stayed down to milk the sin bin, he wasnt going to come off after he was binned but they changed their mind due to the free interchange.

Mulvy wrote:

I know right? I thought maybe it's the Devil's cut or something. It was a split second wasn't it????!!!!!

I dont even think gavet could see that the ball had been passed.

Honeysett wrote:Look I'm fine with that going to be 10 in the bin but you can't base it off an injury or be so inconsistent.

I came on to post this. I’m fine for the binning by now that the standard set now! I don’t want to see any inconsistencies with it

my tv broke wrote:

I dont even think gavet could see that the ball had been passed.

100% mate.

my tv broke wrote:Irrelevant for everyone except that one team in the top 10.. tolman on 7 from just 18 mins

I wish it wasn't relevant to me. Is he injured? 15 to go and he hasn't returned.

Mann playing hooker. I forgot that was apparently the reason they bought him.

Mighty Fishes wrote:

I came on to post this. I’m fine for the binning by now that the standard set now! I don’t want to see any inconsistencies with it

Look I like consistency, but if you take it to the line and turn your back, you're gonna get smashed. I'd be upset if my team didn't smash said player.

Shanbon wrote:Fox comms all calling for the sin bin. It was late but wasnt high, penalty would have been sufficient. The Dogs player stayed down to milk the sin bin, he wasnt going to come off after he was binned but they changed their mind due to the free interchange.

But it’s also on report? So seems like it should be one or the other. Can come down hard on players that go on report for those things or sin bin

I'm just disappointed that no one referenced it as a doggie style hit.

Mulvy wrote:

Look I like consistency, but if you take it to the line and turn your back, you're gonna get smashed. I'd be upset if my team didn't smash said player.

Fuck me I just realised roosters may have 13 on 8 or 9 at times

WT Winfield wrote:I'm just disappointed that no one referenced it as a doggie style hit.

Opportunity missed

Mighty Fishes wrote:

Fuck me I just realised roosters may have 13 on 8 or 9 at times

As long as Crichton scores off the back of it, I'm okay with it.

Pearce and To'o were my two guys tonight so can't be too unhappy.

Mulvy wrote:

As long as Crichton scores off the back of it, I'm okay with it.

He’s my 18th man so I’m torn haha I want him to do well just not that well.. for some reason hah

Silly mistakes by the knights

Knights bombing this game now.

It has clearly touched a knights hand in the air?

Bunker is a flunker.

my tv broke wrote:It has clearly touched a knights hand in the air?

GET FUCKED