NRL Fantasy 2019 Part 69

I reckon it's 50/50 with Watson either on the bench or replacing Lino. Could go either way.

Simmo wrote:

My bad, so ticked off at the game got the refs name wrong. Klein is the bunny I meant.
That sin bin cost the Knights the game. I know they weren't on for this game, but that was total crap.

Fair call! I totally understand I lose my cool and say stupid shit all the time on here haha. 

I truly believe thy could of won even with the sin binning but that awful bunker call is what put them ahead and deflated the Knights. Klein would have won a very healthy bet calling up TAB at half time

Bahh.. they’re putting Fed and Nadal as the second game.. I don’t want to stay up the late...

Despite Barry Toohey usually being on the mark, Id find it hard to believe Lino stays 6 over Watson. Fantasy aside, I think you need watson on the field. The tricky thing for knights might get getting it all to gel

Honeysett wrote:How can you literally say one minute before there's not enough evidence to over turn the decision and then literally overturn it. Sometimes I just don't get our game.

He thought it was a try and the evidence he saw showed it but there was a little doubt. Tried to hide behind "on field decision" just in case it was a controversy and 1+1 equalled two. Then realised he got the on field call mixed up and and corrected his error because the evidence pointed to most likelihood a try and it was now either he say it is = 2 or it is .9 on evidence + 0 for onfield = .9/2 and a bad call. Something like this. Not a good thing but ultimately made the call he felt was correct which for me is the right end regardless of the amateur process.

Clack Bocks wrote:

I was meant to thumbs up that

Fuck I was trying to give him a thumbs up to even it out and fat fingered it sorry Honeysett 

Clack Bocks wrote:

I was meant to thumbs up that

Covered you mate!

Mighty Fishes wrote:

Fuck I was trying to give him a thumbs up to even it out and fat fingered it sorry Honeysett 

I went and gave it a thumbs down just so Honeysett thinks fkn everyone disagrees.

0/0. Solid.

my tv broke wrote:Despite Barry Toohey usually being on the mark, Id find it hard to believe Lino stays 6 over Watson. Fantasy aside, I think you need watson on the field. The tricky thing for knights might get getting it all to gel

Was about to post the same thing.

my tv broke wrote:Despite Barry Toohey usually being on the mark, Id find it hard to believe Lino stays 6 over Watson. Fantasy aside, I think you need watson on the field. The tricky thing for knights might get getting it all to gel

Apart from the defensive error to let CHN score I thought Lino has been very good. I like Watson and I think he’s more elusive from a kick return but he’ll never be at fullback with Ponga playing. imagine him coming off the bench fresh running around tired forwards. Super sub

WT Winfield wrote:

I went and gave it a thumbs down just so Honeysett thinks fkn everyone disagrees.

DaGold wrote:

He thought it was a try and the evidence he saw showed it but there was a little doubt.  Tried to hide behind "on field decision" just in case it was a controversy and 1+1 equalled two.  Then realised he got the on field call mixed up and and corrected his error because the evidence pointed to most likelihood a try and it was now either he say it is = 2 or it is .9 on evidence + 0 for onfield = .9/2 and a bad call.  Something like this.  Not a good thing but ultimately made the call he felt was correct which for me is the right end regardless of the amateur process.

This explanation makes my head hurt.

Mighty Fishes wrote:

Apart from the defensive error to let CHN score I thought Lino has been very good. I like Watson and I think he’s more elusive from a kick return but he’ll never be at fullback with Ponga playing. imagine him coming off the bench fresh running around tired forwards. Super sub

Yeah not a bad point!

Spuddies wrote:Wakeham did well scoring 41. How long is Foran out for?

Still can’t believe they have Lewis playing reserve grade

They should have gone with the on field decision of no-try as it was questionable,  even so it wasn't a terrible call. The Gavet sinbin was a horrible decision which cost the Knights the game.

cheers to Turbo for being out and forcing my hand of cashing out Mann, only problem is, with the threat of Isaako's late inclusion, the only suitable WFB was Javid Bowen, who i'm not at all confident will score a positive amount of points by the time the game is done

Mighty Fishes wrote:

Still can’t believe they have Lewis playing reserve grade

Isn't Lewis injured now? Wakeham was my plan B if Pearce had been rested tonight and my main concern was definitely Lewis' return over Foran because we all know that if Foran is back next week, he won't be back the week after.

Made an earlier post about needing a cheaper WFB option than Burns to fill in for Turbo this week (and as a future 19th man). DWZ was top of the list but I went with Gutho. Tinge of regret over that decision already...

I’ve said it on here before but the knights are among a group of clubs that it’s easy to make dud calls against. Wouldn’t see the storm or roosters copping that sin bin which turned the game

That deciding try was a knock on as through my knights colored glasses I saw a knock on for sure. More than enough to stick with the on ground decision but wrong colour jersey

That all being said, we should have scored more points first half and piss poor effort second half

rhinoceroo wrote:0/0. Solid.

I hesitate to admit how much this made me LOL.