filthridden wrote:
He wasn't happy with a sexist joke and doesn't want to stick around. Thought that was pretty clear.
Oh I know.
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
filthridden wrote:
He wasn't happy with a sexist joke and doesn't want to stick around. Thought that was pretty clear.
Fraser wrote:Im screwed this week and have to play Carrigan as starting FRF.
Here's hoping the Broncos kick out to a solid early lead so they can reduce Haas' workload and let Carrigan pick up some extra mins. I would hate to see young Haas over doing it and burning himself out early in the season, or maybe I'm just being selfish.
wolfking wrote:
Not bad, especially with 5 trades still remaining mate, well done.
filthridden wrote:
He wasn't happy with a sexist joke and doesn't want to stick around. Thought that was pretty clear.
Nrl4Life wrote:
Thanks m8 in the top 2000 now. 1000+ 2 weeks in a row
surmo13 wrote:
good lord, if that was sexist, stand-up comedy is cancelled, there's none left (men or women) once the outrage mob comes for them all.
wolfking wrote:
Bloody awesome team too mate.
surmo13 wrote:
good lord, if that was sexist, stand-up comedy is cancelled, there's none left (men or women) once the outrage mob comes for them all.
wolfking wrote:
Yeah, my comment before was in disbelief, not that I didn't know what is going on. People need to pull their heads out of their own asses sometimes IMO.
StormTrooper96 wrote:
Only problem is no PODS. Team is solid as fuck and probably has the top players in each position just about... only problem is you need that 1-2 PODs in your team to climb up the ranks.
Ben Marlin wrote:
Thank you
You raise some good points but no hooker has scored below their PPM since round 11.
WT Winfield wrote:
Yeah as I just said to Revs in PM, I doubt any women would be offended by that. Maybe ask them first before getting emo over it.
StormTrooper96 wrote:
I just think people need to realise not everyone has the same opinion as one another. We are all brought up in different families, environments with different beliefs, thoughts and tendencies. The world tells us to be ourselves, and believe in what we believe in yet when someone preaches their belief they get shun down and attacked for it (speaking general world consensus here). I myself don't specifically choose to preach what I believe as I am an atheist who believes in science and equality. I just find it hard when someone like folau, who yes is supposed to be a role model, gets shun down for preaching in what he believes, yet we praise and glorify people who believe that the crossing lights should be female! I am all for equal wage and equality amongst all living beings but seriously do we not have more pressing issues like terrorism, unemployment and debt in our country!
Rippin and Tearin wrote:
Interesting mate, and nice work.
Therefore I think your 3.44% figure is probably the best stat of them all. Chuck a CI around that though and I suspect it would contain zero.
Love what you've done though mate!
Johnny B Goode wrote:
There is no rivalry, I don't even know who they are.
Regardless I've seen what passes for hilarity on this forum and with it I think it's a good time to bid this place farewell and adieu for the year.
filthridden wrote:
devils advocate here but would you say it to Belinda Sleeman's face and if not, why not?
filthridden wrote:
He wasn't happy with a sexist joke and doesn't want to stick around. Thought that was pretty clear.
WT Winfield wrote:
Yeah as I just said to Revs in PM, I doubt any women would be offended by that. Maybe ask them first before getting emo over it.