Loomer wrote:Has there been any score updates from last night's game? I saw a post someone reckoned Paix was owed about 6pts. Hope so
He went from 34 to 35 so updates might be done?
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
Loomer wrote:Has there been any score updates from last night's game? I saw a post someone reckoned Paix was owed about 6pts. Hope so
I have been pretty vocal that Turbo needs tonnes of attacking stats to get a decent WFB score and that others are in the running to be WFB3 at a cheaper price point.Pookus McFly wrote:Love all the hindsight bias on this forum. Suddenly everybody always knew Turbo wasn’t all that great right after he doesn’t do all that great, but they definitely kept their mouths shut when people were bringing him in for this week and now admit they were confused why people would do it. Well speak up earlier people- this is an advice and discussion forum, express your opinions!
Well I thought he would score 60 and I still didn’t bring him in. What do I win?
Pookus McFly wrote:Love all the hindsight bias on this forum. Suddenly everybody always knew Turbo wasn’t all that great right after he doesn’t do all that great, but they definitely kept their mouths shut when people were bringing him in for this week and now admit they were confused why people would do it. Well speak up earlier people- this is an advice and discussion forum, express your opinions!
Well I thought he would score 60 and I still didn’t bring him in. What do I win?
Yeah typically just 1 adjustment round and occasionally a late update for a couple of players, like Drinkwater last week. Really different to supercoach, which has 3 distinct rounds of updates that see scores moving all over the place.robelgordo wrote:
He went from 34 to 35 so updates might be done?
Chewie wrote:I pegged Paix as a 35point player, I'm not surprised. In last week's game he had a few more tackle to make.
my tv broke wrote:
Ay ? I've made my thoughts on Turbo pretty clear from the outset.
I'm not here to sway other peoples decisions on who to bring in.
Verbal Kint wrote:
Meh, I look at matchups - particularly for a new cash cow. Its not the key deciding factor but it'll play a part
StormTrooper96 wrote:
I think Turbo is a gun.
my tv broke wrote:
So do I, but any time you bring him in, doesn't change the fact his scores can range from 30 to 75+ on any given week.
Loomer wrote:
If he does that 2 more games I've made around $162k I'll take that
StormTrooper96 wrote:Anyways 359 from 5 is okay. Carrigan boosting his final team chances again last night. Might just leave Haas and Carrigan at FRF all year? Klemmer/Twal my only other targets for that position i think at the moment.
I have 7 playing tonight, 8 if you count my loop and 10 if you count my EMG.
Camo123 wrote:
Carrigan is perfectly viable for final 17, I prefer him on bench for FRF/2RF cover though, but that's down to me having Twal already (who hopefully is a season keeper at FRF)