NRL Fantasy Part 75 - Seibold and Seibeautiful

Bethany_B wrote:

It's not even so much the trade burning a hole in my pocket, I know I have to trade this week to get 17, just not 100% sure who to sell. Flanno and Randall are both fit and dropped, and there's no clear info on when or if either one will be back.

I know I'm definitely selling one of them.

Here's some info

One was signed to be the starting halfback for the defending premiers and has been given some time to work on his game.
The other has had two players signed (McCullough and Green) so that his club doesn't have to play him.

Which one sounds like they will be back sooner

Geez don’t say that MS!

For the first time I’m questioning trading out Robson. How dare you!

Loomer wrote:

I sold Lucy and bought Cook because of the 4 trades round. Cook has scored 373 and lost 53k Lucy scored 371 and made 124k.

I’m too worried about no halves or hooker coverage though. I can’t put myself through that for another week.

Being at work 10 hours tomorrow for a long one if Cleary was a late out I’m completely fucked. Ranking would plummet. Wouldn’t have time to kale a late sneaky trade.

If Burton is cut from the 21 man squad tonight I’ll make no trades, but if he is still in their 19 man squad then I trade Cook in.

multiple.scoregasms wrote:

Here's some info

One was signed to be the starting halfback for the defending premiers and has been given some time to work on his game.
The other has had two players signed (McCullough and Green) so that his club doesn't have to play him.

Which one sounds like they will be back sooner

The point is that I don't trust either one to be back soon enough for me. Carrying Randall on my bench is a much lower opportunity cost than carrying Flanno on my bench.

Selling Flanno means I can either bank cash by going Lam or Dearden, or a borderline gun like Moses or Taukeiaho (though I probably won't go Moses with that niggling calf injury), while selling Randall means my options are very limited.

If I had 17 warm bodies without trading this week, then I would obviously hold my trades and carry both of them, but one has to go unless I want to run 16 this week (or 15 if the Lomax out rumours are true)

Rabbits21 wrote:If Burton is cut from the 21 man squad tonight I’ll make no trades, but if he is still in their 19 man squad then I trade Cook in.

Is this about mysterious Cleary injury I've not seen mentioned anywhere but a post on here?

Rabbits21 wrote:
I’m too worried about no halves or hooker coverage though. I can’t put myself through that for another week.

Being at work 10 hours tomorrow for a long one if Cleary was a late out I’m completely fucked. Ranking would plummet. Wouldn’t have time to kale a late sneaky trade.

I think what everyone is trying to say is just make the trade!

No one has a crystal ball that tells them when players are going to be rested/injured/rotated. you make trades because you think it is beneficial to your team not because of a a scenario which may or may not happen. Team balance is good so your trade is good.

Getting Cook in seems pretty safe.....no one has any new info, so stop asking the same question and just do the trade.

EDIT : or don't do it but it's your choice

Loomer wrote:

Is this about mysterious Cleary injury I've not seen mentioned anywhere but a post on here?

Cleary has to get rested sooner or later doesn’t he?

Panthers are guaranteed a top four finish anyway.

wolfking wrote:I wonder if that's Joey's family meaning wife and kids?  A bit of a concern being a Lucy owner.

Wife and kids.

Rabbits21 wrote:
Cleary has to get rested sooner or later doesn’t he?

Panthers are guaranteed a top four finish anyway.

Sure maybe. Probably not for club's record breaking 9th win in a row opportunity

Rabbits21 wrote:
Cleary has to get rested sooner or later doesn’t he?

Panthers are guaranteed a top four finish anyway.

Yes, but Cleary doesn't want to miss out on Dally M points...

Chewie wrote:

Yes, but Cleary doesn't want to miss out on Dally M points...

oh right, I didn’t know if he still qualified to win that after his suspension.....

Rabbits21 wrote:
oh right, I didn’t know if he still qualified to win that after his suspension.....

I think he still qualifies, but missed out on points because of it

Reminder that anyone who doesn't Tedes(C)o is a coward

ytsb wrote:Reminder that anyone who doesn't Tedes(C)o is a coward

I captained Teddy for 4 weeks in a row (round 9-12), I think I've earned the right to not do it anymore That said vs Brisbane in round 16 I might do it one more time

Bethany_B wrote:

I captained Teddy for 4 weeks in a row (round 9-12), I think I've earned the right to not do it anymore That said vs Brisbane in round 16 I might do it one more time

He will repay his avoid supporters after a measly 20 last round with a 90. Never mind he has no chemistry with Lam compared to Flanagan

Loomer wrote:

I sold Lucy and bought Cook because of the 4 trades round. Cook has scored 373 and lost 53k Lucy scored 371 and made 124k.

Hahaha, its just a large group of fantasy mad punters chasing there tails.. picture it!!

Pretty happy. Don't have to worry about trades today... None of my trades involve players tonight or tomorrow so can stress out even more until Saturday

WT2K wrote:

Wife and kids.

Thanks mate. I'm secretly backing your team to turn things around after last week and be competitive the year out.

Rabbits21 wrote:
Cleary has to get rested sooner or later doesn’t he?

Haven't seen anything saying halves have to be rested before the end of the year.
Or is it only star halves? Is DCE also going to be rested? Moses/Brown? George Williams? Pearce? Just Cleary and no one else? Not Luai at some stage as well?