Sleepy wrote:
Onion???
Not a Simpsons fan?
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
Sleepy wrote:
Onion???
StormTrooper96 wrote:
My wedding day is in September this year. My goal is to get down to 95... Currently at about 105 (I honestly don't look 105, no clue how I am that weight). Playing AFL this year and doing all the pre-season conditioning is helping me, plus boot camp every other day and watching what I am eating. To be 95 or under on my wedding day would really be such a blessing for me. Last time I was that light was when I was on Keto and I was 92 kg's (2019).
My missus just started the Lady Shake and I am thinking of going on the Man Shake for a bit to see how I go.
Thats me too. I was 72 kg in my late teens and skinny as a rake. Wouldn't have been 65kg since early teens.Honeysett wrote:I went from 120kgs to 100kgs to 120kgs and slowly going back down again.
Luckily I'm quite tall and can carry it well but going to hit 100 again soon. I buy clothes a size smaller so that I feel good when they fit properly. Gives me that little increase in motivation at times.
Honeysett wrote:I went from 120kgs to 100kgs to 120kgs and slowly going back down again.
Luckily I'm quite tall and can carry it well but going to hit 100 again soon. I buy clothes a size smaller so that I feel good when they fit properly. Gives me that little increase in motivation at times.
The NRL already has certain numbers representing different positionsdanaconda86 wrote:Good compromise would be to adopt something similar to the NFL, where players can choose from a set range of numbers based on their position:
1–9: quarterbacks, kickers, and punters
10–19: quarterbacks, kickers, punters, and wide receivers
20–39: running backs and defensive backs
40–49: running backs, defensive backs, linebackers, and tight ends
50–59: linebackers, defensive linemen, and centers
60–79: offensive linemen and defensive linemen
80–89: wide receivers and tight ends
90–99: linebackers and defensive linemen
That way, you get used to certain numbers being a position e.g. #87 is usually a TE: Gronk, Kelce etc. But there's is also room for the number to become synonymous with a player i.e. Tom Brady 12, Pat Mahomes 15 etc.
Bottom line - it would boost jersey sales which has to be good for the clubs/NRL.
StormTrooper96 wrote:
I am a massive yoyo dieter. My weight fluctuates every year, mainly goes up around Christmas time
I think the tallness helps me not look as big as the scales say. Trying on my wedding suit made me want to get rid of it all!!!
The hardest part is remember that this won't happen in a week or two and to just keep pushing.
StormTrooper96 wrote:
I am a massive yoyo dieter. My weight fluctuates every year, mainly goes up around Christmas time
I think the tallness helps me not look as big as the scales say. Trying on my wedding suit made me want to get rid of it all!!!
The hardest part is remember that this won't happen in a week or two and to just keep pushing.
Bad form by me, will go and get my head back in the gameJack Torrance wrote:
Not a Simpsons fan?
Honeysett wrote:
My partner sells beer, she gets free beer all the time which is my biggest pitfall. Plus I'm saving for a house so the coke use is minimal now.
I don't look at what I'm doing now as dieting as I think that has a time limit mentality on it. I made lifestyle changes and just stick to them. I'm going down roughly 1-1.5kgs per week with 4 gym sessions a week. The coolest thing for me is seeing how strong I'm getting, going from benching 30kgs @ 12 reps for 4 sets to 60kgs within the matter of a few weeks is a cool feeling.
I also find it annoying that the girlfriend doesn't care what I look like, I want her to hate it when I put on weight hahaha.
michaelz101 wrote:I’m looking at dragons middle. I heard Wacko say Josh Kerr is going to stay at edge. Does that mean there is a chance Alvaro starts at prop with Vaughan? PPM beast from years ago.
Honeysett wrote:
My partner sells beer, she gets free beer all the time
my tv broke wrote:
I think that Poasa is the more likely to start prop with Vaughan, may be a decent option himself.
If starting prop, would be hard not to select him at $293kmy tv broke wrote:
I think that Poasa is the more likely to start prop with Vaughan, may be a decent option himself.
StormTrooper96 wrote:
Who would be 2RF? Kerr and Sims?
So middle would be split between Lawrie, Alvaro, Ford, Vaughn, Merrin, Poasa, Fuimaono?
Is he up against Graham in round 1? If so it can only end badly, will get schooled.my tv broke wrote:
no idea hey, griffin can't seriously start with kerr on an edge, can he?
they've got bigger problems than the broncos
michaelz101 wrote:I’m looking at dragons middle. I heard Wacko say Josh Kerr is going to stay at edge. Does that mean there is a chance Alvaro starts at prop with Vaughan? PPM beast from years ago.
my tv broke wrote:
no idea hey, griffin can't seriously start with kerr on an edge, can he?
they've got bigger problems than the broncos