mattnz wrote:
Seems that there are 3 potential options, Schuster, Parker or Burbo. Unless Young is seriously injured (havent heard either way), I wouldn't expect CHN to be starting.
CHN at best takes Suttons or Solis spot on the bench.
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
mattnz wrote:
Seems that there are 3 potential options, Schuster, Parker or Burbo. Unless Young is seriously injured (havent heard either way), I wouldn't expect CHN to be starting.
wolfking wrote:
I guess it's between him and Lam I trade. Not that confident either at all.
wolfking wrote:
He got 80 due to the 2 HIA's I believe, bit I'm happy enough with the trade in.
Mulvy wrote:
I guess at least Milford was dominating the kicking KMs, even though there were a low number of KMs overall last week. Keary, as well as dominating the attacking is also dominating the long kicks which doesn't leave much for Lam to score with. Ideally I'd punt both their asses. Just feels a bit reactionary, but I honestly think they are both duds. Then again unless a must have cow pops up, might as well hold them. Not confident in Turpin either.
That was Turpin's only 80 minute game scoring less than 49.wolfking wrote:
Yeah, add Turpin in, I believe all 3 are duds lol.
Mulvy wrote:
I guess at least Milford was dominating the kicking KMs, even though there were a low number of KMs overall last week. Keary, as well as dominating the attacking is also dominating the long kicks which doesn't leave much for Lam to score with. Ideally I'd punt both their asses. Just feels a bit reactionary, but I honestly think they are both duds. Then again unless a must have cow pops up, might as well hold them. Not confident in Turpin either.
mattnz wrote:
Seems that there are 3 potential options, Schuster, Parker or Burbo. Unless Young is seriously injured (havent heard either way), I wouldnt expect CHN to be starting.
mattnz wrote:This round looks like most games are going to be quite evenly matched:
Panthers Storm
Roosters Souths
Dragons Manly
Raiders Warriors
Broncos Bulldogs
Eels Sharks (may be the most one sided game)
Knights Tigers
Cowboys Titans
If there are any total points for the weekend betting options, could be a good week to opt for lower scoring.
my tv broke wrote:
I think most likely scenario is schuster stays on bench and parker (des suggested this) or maybe aloiaia start on edge
Whoever it is will be opposing Kerr this week so maybe we can just have a prop v prop battle on that edge haha
easytiger wrote:
Des said in the press conference last week that he would not yet be making changes to his starting line-up (come Tuesday he had dropped Gosie for Davey).
I think Des just chucks an idea out there at press conferences without any major thought or real intention behind it.
Dailey = Laurie?Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:Can probably get away with another week of no trades, which seems bonkers.
Brailey
Welch, NAS, Tino
Tupouniua, Riki
Cleary, Munster
Momo, Niu
Pappy, Brimson, Dailey
Turpin, Watson, Lam, Lodge
Liddle, Roberts, Utoikamanu, Reimis
Any thoughts on what to do. Kind of keen on an upgrade/downgrade to get Fifita in if possible
Mulvy wrote:
I guess at least Milford was dominating the kicking KMs, even though there were a low number of KMs overall last week. Keary, as well as dominating the attacking is also dominating the long kicks which doesn't leave much for Lam to score with. Ideally I'd punt both their asses. Just feels a bit reactionary, but I honestly think they are both duds. Then again unless a must have cow pops up, might as well hold them. Not confident in Turpin either.
mattnz wrote:
Dailey = Laurie?
easytiger wrote:
Putting on my Des cap, any one on Manly's roster who is fit may end up playing at 2RF, because what even are roles anyway?, they're either good footballers or not (and even if they're not, they can still start on an edge or at Hooker!)
Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:
Not even sure how that autocorrected lol. Bang on
my tv broke wrote:
i assumed it was intentional.
was wondering how long til the surmo rant re nicknames h aha
mattnz wrote:
If he is going for a NSW style, put the best players in the starting team approach, would have to be Schuster. Need to find a spot for him to spark them.