NRL Fantasy 2021 Part 58 - 17 Green dots edition

BCT05 wrote:

That's a lot of minutes to be soaked up if Haas and Lodge are both out and with Carrigan out for season. That forward pack will be a sight next week

Yeah, all about next year for them now. No idea if the Lodge thing is right now or how many weeks away though.

Milchcow wrote:
So given Hynes's scoring compared to his starting price. Is this a broken game that has to be changed? or am I just a salty non owner

I agree the game should price players at what they will be in five weeks' time not what they are to begin with.

Camo123 wrote:So I traded Crichton to Tohu to avoid playing with 16

Is it worth reversing and playing with 16 and trading Haas next week instead

I’ve done this if instead of “playing with 16” you mean “playing with Simo”

Milchcow wrote:
So given Hynes's scoring compared to his starting price. Is this a broken game that has to be changed? or am I just a salty non owner

I thought Hynes was too risky on the basis he’d average 45-55 over the next three. Someone could have told me he’d bash out a 90

Milchcow wrote:
So given Hynes's scoring compared to his starting price. Is this a broken game that has to be changed? or am I just a salty non owner

Start up a Facebook page for non owners, I'll join

Major learning point this year is to trade in players after they score 100. Almost guaranteed the most traded in player will go big again

robelgordo wrote:

I thought Hynes was too risky on the basis he’d average 45-55 over the next three. Someone could have told me he’d bash out a 90

He told you last week! 

I for one am disappointed he didn't get 100.

robelgordo wrote:

I thought Hynes was too risky on the basis he’d average 45-55 over the next three. Someone could have told me he’d bash out a 90

One does not simply bet against a Storm player against the Broncos at Suncorp

multiple.scoregasms wrote:Major learning point this year is to trade in players after they score 100. Almost guaranteed the most traded in player will go big again

Since I traded in Olam and Hynes they have scored me 215 points.
An average of 53 and a smidge per player.

I’m playing this game right haha

Hynes fired one warning shot in rd 3, since rd 7 its been a BBQ type run of scores

Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:

Since I traded in Olam and Hynes they have scored me 215 points.
An average of 53 and a smidge per player.

I’m playing this game right haha

Such a swerve for me and Olam, was it last week or the one b4, he was in my team as a trade in, and pre lockout I swapped him out and played with 16 only for momo to get a late call up with Edwards out.

Revraiser wrote:

Such a swerve for me and Olam, was it last week or the one b4,  he was in my team as a trade in, and pre lockout I swapped him out and played with 16 only for momo to get a late call up with Edwards out.

That’s excellent work from you mate haha. I’m very salty about it but what can I do

Milchcow wrote:
So given Hynes's scoring compared to his starting price. Is this a broken game that has to be changed? or am I just a salty non owner

robelgordo wrote:

I thought Hynes was too risky on the basis he’d average 45-55 over the next three. Someone could have told me he’d bash out a 90

multiple.scoregasms wrote:Major learning point this year is to trade in players after they score 100. Almost guaranteed the most traded in player will go big again

People can get stubborn about these things though. Yes a 90 is dumb luck, but I traded him in on the basis that two scores of 40 makes a 100k and anything else is a bonus. When sideways trading over origin, anyone who can give me bye round points and make 80-100k in the process is a winner in my book.

Mulvy wrote:





People can get stubborn about these things though. Yes a 90 is dumb luck, but I traded him in on the basis that two scores of 40 makes a 100k and anything else is a bonus. When sideways trading over origin, anyone who can give me bye round points and make 80-100k in the process is a winner in my book.

I brought him in the other week hoping for exactly that, an average of 45-50 and hopefully make 150k in the process. Absolutely no way I was expecting almost 250k in two games

I brought Hynes in week 8, peak price of 327k, already made 231k & played him each week. How good am I?

11k rank says otherwise.

Mulvy wrote:





People can get stubborn about these things though. Yes a 90 is dumb luck, but I traded him in on the basis that two scores of 40 makes a 100k and anything else is a bonus. When sideways trading over origin, anyone who can give me bye round points and make 80-100k in the process is a winner in my book.

Reverse salty....

Revraiser wrote:I brought Hynes in week 8, peak price of 327k, already made 231k played him each week. How good am I?

11k rank says otherwise.

You've had a couple of lucky breaks recently. Only way is up from here

Revraiser wrote:I brought Hynes in week 8, peak price of 327k, already made 231k & played him each week. How good am I?

11k rank says otherwise.

Like a wet Nostradamus

multiple.scoregasms wrote:

You've had a couple of lucky breaks recently. Only way is up from here

Only top 1k will suffice and feel acceptable.

Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:

Like a wet Nostradamus

Wet ??