Mulvy wrote:
Maybe, but Tohu 62-63.
Thought that as I was typing, maybe not a valid trade out for me though. Harris is in this week regardless.
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
Mulvy wrote:
Maybe, but Tohu 62-63.
I'm holding Farnworth myself, I think you could at least use him as an emergency wfb/ctr cover and when Teddy rests play you could play him when need bebigbruno wrote:Looking at 4 trades this week also.. down to 7 if I go ahead with it but my team is looking pretty set
Trades:
Farnworth / Laurie / BHunt / RTS -> Verrills / SJ / Averillo / Tohu
Team is looking like:
JBrai
Haas - Angus - Tohu
iPap - Dfifi
(C)leary - Fog
Bird - Avo
Hynes - Teddy - Walsh
CHN - Nikora - Moses - SJ
CWatson - Verrils - A.Kelly - Mbye
Any thoughts whether I'm going overkill here? Leaves me with 7 trades and 18kITB.
Injuries a side my team is final(ish) bar Hynes -> Papy and Ponga coming in and maybe Cook post origin. Feedback greatly appreciated!
MayorofAlburquerque wrote:Howdy Y'all,
Are any of you stats boffins with copious amounts of year-on-year data and excel-savy know-how able to shed light on the trends that have led to the ascendancy of the HLF position? Out of the top-10 averaging players, it breaks down to:
HLF = 4
WFB = 3
MID = 2
EDG = 1
NB: 2 of these are Keary and Morris
NB: Pos. 11-12 are HKRs
I'm not sure how this compares to the top-10 from previous years. Is it because kick-metres have increased? Or are halves scoring and contributing more points under the new rules? Or just the decline of the 80-minute Hooker? Anyone got any insight?
Seems to explain why most teams are ending up Halves-heavy - Premiums like Cleary, DCE, Hughes (who seems an outlier on the KM front), value picks like Moses, Fogarty, SJ, and that jerk Averillo with his billion KMs per game because that's All the Bulldogs gameplan ever is. An end-bench with 2-3 HLFs is probably an option.
One thing seems clear though...The Hooker is dead. Long live the Hooker.
The Mayor.
Khany wrote:As mentioned by others the Broncos can make the most average player look like a champion. Simo still a risk.
Some advice for my team would be welcome please from you yourself the guru!Mulvy wrote:
Gees you're not wrong mate, bloody ridiculous!
MayorofAlburquerque wrote:Howdy Y'all,
Are any of you stats boffins with copious amounts of year-on-year data and excel-savy know-how able to shed light on the trends that have led to the ascendancy of the HLF position? Out of the top-10 averaging players, it breaks down to:
HLF = 4
WFB = 3
MID = 2
EDG = 1
NB: 2 of these are Keary and Morris
NB: Pos. 11-12 are HKRs
I'm not sure how this compares to the top-10 from previous years. Is it because kick-metres have increased? Or are halves scoring and contributing more points under the new rules? Or just the decline of the 80-minute Hooker? Anyone got any insight?
Seems to explain why most teams are ending up Halves-heavy - Premiums like Cleary, DCE, Hughes (who seems an outlier on the KM front), value picks like Moses, Fogarty, SJ, and that jerk Averillo with his billion KMs per game because that's All the Bulldogs gameplan ever is. An end-bench with 2-3 HLFs is probably an option.
One thing seems clear though...The Hooker is dead. Long live the Hooker.
The Mayor.
Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:@rev
My post in reply earlier wasn’t an attack on your strategy at all mate.
You will finish higher I’m sure of it just taking a different approach.
Sitting on the fence if you will
Honey Badger wrote:
My only concern is you are trading out 3 players that can play wfb and now left with just Mbye covering ctr/wfb. Or are you looking to bring in ponga next rd?
mrbrownstone wrote:I don't know about selling Matto and Watson, but the more I think about it, it's so hard to pass up:
Laurie -> Verills
Matto -> DiFi
Watson -> Haas/Thompson
Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:Had a quick browse and Schoupp is the only player that fits the bill in the sub 300k range.