mrbrownstone wrote:
I don't mind Brimson and Kobe.
Curran + Staines comes in at 824k. Curran playing 80 with Tohu out and cross your fingers for a few Staines tries maybe.
Nice. That could be the winner.
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
mrbrownstone wrote:
I don't mind Brimson and Kobe.
Curran + Staines comes in at 824k. Curran playing 80 with Tohu out and cross your fingers for a few Staines tries maybe.
ynot wrote:Charts for post Rd 19:
mrbrownstone wrote:
I don't mind Brimson and Kobe.
Curran + Staines comes in at 824k. Curran playing 80 with Tohu out and cross your fingers for a few Staines tries maybe.
Mulvy wrote:
Nah no buffer, and I wanted a MID anyway.
Might be better to forgo Cleary. Again assuming that SJ, AFB and Hynes will all be trades I'd have enough cash to turn those three into maybe something like Murray, Cook, Ponga.
Cook
Haas Lolo Murray
Fifita CHN
DCE Moses
Burton Averillo
Teddy Turbo Ponga
Crichton Fogarty Koro Brailey
Matterson Walsh Peachey Verills.
Stronger squad, but no Cleary.
Mulvy wrote:
Was Curran 80min the beneficiary of two failed HIAs though?
wolfking wrote:
FWIW, I'll have to cancel my Cleary plans mate and I'll go DCE instead. I know you already have him, but gives me DCE but 3 trades for injuries. I think in your situation, may be better for the Cook/Murray option.
Problem is if Cleary doesn't fire or actually goes down, you've got a million dollars on your bench with no trades to do anything with him. It's a big IF but the risk is there.
ynot wrote:Charts for post Rd 19:
Mulvy wrote:
Bloody hell, my first matchup is against Pacey coming off an absolute monster score.
Camo123 wrote:Thompson contesting ban
Camo123 wrote:Thompson contesting ban
Mulvy wrote:
I think you're right. It means I can keep playing Hynes and keep a trade up might sleeve until the wheels fall off without having to worry as much price changes. The longer I can hold trades the better.
Camo123 wrote:Thompson contesting ban
wolfking wrote:
Hmm.....would be hard to see him getting off, no?
Camo123 wrote:
If he’s challenging grading I reckon he might be successful (fine only). If he’s challenged the charge then he is fucked
Personally happy he’s done it as it’s an easy decision either way for me (keep or sell)
Pacey's Best wrote:
No worries Mulvy. What happened last week was so good to enjoy but I'm sure that won't happen again.
filthridden wrote:
These are two different posters but I do like the idea of combining them into one.