Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:
Oops drunk fingered ya Rev.
I do apologise
Ohh gee, wish I could say I hadn't heard that before....
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:
Oops drunk fingered ya Rev.
I do apologise
Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:God this Brailey v Walsh decision is hard to make.
Walsh’s scores have been so erratic, even with a try last week was pants. Brailey could get a rest if Randall stays on but at least ya can bank a 45-50 on a standard day
WT2K wrote:
Sharks have it in the bag
standard-issue wrote:
We didn’t stay mate, the horses were tired and we had a game of croquet scheduled on the front lawns.
standard-issue wrote:
We didn’t stay mate, the horses were tired and we had a game of croquet scheduled on the front lawns.
filthridden wrote:Draw the best outcome for Warriors fans here but I'm happy to cheer on the Tigers in maybe a 15-20 point victory, please
Cookie Monster wrote:
There's something in the looping thread for you Wolfie
wolfking wrote:
Thanks mate, you're a genius. Worried if they both score well though haha.
Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:Oops drunk fingered ya Rev.Revraiser wrote:When it's on the line and it is Tigers v Sharks, I get runny loins type feelings... don't feel good about today.
I do apologise
Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:God this Brailey v Walsh decision is hard to make.
Walsh’s scores have been so erratic, even with a try last week was pants. Brailey could get a rest if Randall stays on but at least ya can bank a 45-50 on a standard day
Think I’m gonna back a Brailey try and hope for the best haha.WT Winfield wrote:
Yeah I know mate, I couldn't really make up my mind when talking about it the other day either.
Brailey's attacking stats have dried up completely since Rd 12, but against Dogs is as good an opportunity as any. He's managed to hit some mid 50s without them recently. Randall's presence gave me a pause at first, but with no DSaifiti and Frizell, he might just be there to plug a hole in rotations.
I kinda defaulted to playing Brailey since Walsh is a WFB, but isn't as clearcut between HK and WFB this season.
Does Walsh carve up the Broncos because he knows them, or do they shut him down because they know him? Or is it totally irrelevant? Probably
I tipped Broncos, but don't feel good about it. Tough one to predict.
WT2K wrote:Kennedy and Tracey about to rip the tigers apart. Tune in.
Rabbits21 wrote:
I’m very worked up about it.
Some points I picked up watching the 2nd half.
We’ve certainly been screwed.
Early 2nd half Burton takes Sauce high a metre from the line. No penalty
Next tackle Cody grubbers and host is poleaxed by a Cleary escort.....again no penalty. We had them in the rack
not long after, Cook legitimately gets ball when there’s no dummy half. Capewell moved off the mark. Wrongly penalised
Panthers Forward pass from dummy half in the play where sauce gets penalised for escort which had no effect on the play unlike the Cleary one on us moments earlier....why?
somehow the ref Plucked a high tackle penalty against walker out of his arse when it wasn’t
Questionable penalty against Tom to level the scores. He draped the armver the shoulder. Many others in the game similar not penalised
Luai offside when forcing goal line restart
60% possession to them at the 20 minute mark through no fault of our. We’ve been very good defensively
Downtown penalty with 18 to go was the bunker imposing itself for no reason. When was the last time we saw that penalty given?
Sauce drops the bomb with 16 to go. ouch. He had actually been good until then
14 minutes remaining leota clearly runs a shepherd leading to the try. Often theses are disallowed
12 to go. Luai offside then chases and drops knees into sauces head. Should have been Our penalty
9 to go, walker smashed high by offside Cleary. Restart instead of penalty we should have been down in their 20m
Field goal. Yeo & Crichton downtown blockers but that’s ok?
filthridden wrote:standard-issue wrote:
We didn’t stay mate, the horses were tired and we had a game of croquet scheduled on the front lawns.
Croquet on the FRONT lawn? You sir are sixpence short of a shilling!