Camo123 wrote:
Logic and probability would probably suggest you're more likely to need cover for a position with 3 players right? Though doesn't count for loads of variables like injury risk, and a load of fantasy factors like DPP and position scarcity
I think the question he really wants to ask is:
1 cover at HOK with 1 cover at MID; or
0 cover at HOK with 2 cover at MID