NRL Fantasy 2022 Part 15 - dropping fantasy points for fun

Honey Badger wrote:

He passed the eye test in the trials

And in Round 1

Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:Round 1: 797 (Rank 24970)
Round 2: 794 (Rank 13589)

Consistency

My consistency is being consistently shit! I’m into the top 50000 now so be afraid, be very afraid!

2021
Rd1: score 888, round rank 14046, overall rank 14046
Rd2: score 916, round rank 16592, overall rank 13070

2022
Rd1: score 840, round rank 14078, overall rank 14078
Rd2: score 792, round rank 6163, overall rank 7930

Had a similar start to last season with a rank of 14k in round 1. In 2021 it took me till about round 5 to get below 8k so I'm doing better this year (even with a sub 800 score)

Holy Moly wrote:

Thanks for confiding in me in public.

8.4k OR.

Changes to be made, top of the hitlist are Uto and Bullymore, quickly followed by Clark & Lolo, although these two can be given a little more time.

Likely to bring the plodder King in and more the exciting Ming to the 13-17. Bully to any potential cows that pop up!

Sticking to the guns of saving for (C)leary, as many will panic and when he comes back and rips out 100's again, will be stuck.

I’m only just inside the top 20k - hoping for some Mitchell update a promised by Rabs21 to get me closer to 19k than 20k

Feels better than being 20k this time last year tbh.

Have enjoyed learning that a few people complaining about how bad they run all the time have me covered my thousands though. I’ll have to ramp up my negativity

I haven’t heard anything specific on Bullemor but though he got injured? So if he’s now fit and named to start, I don’t see how he’s an immediate sell?

Honey Badger wrote:

He passed the eye test in the trials

Is that like HIA?

robelgordo wrote:I haven’t heard anything specific on Bullemor but though he got injured? So if he’s now fit and named to start, I don’t see how he’s an immediate sell?

If he is named to start I agree. I assumed the injury would have him missing this week if it was enough for him to come off

The Pascoe Fiasco wrote:
And in Round 1

My eyes definitely told me he would have 1.5ppm

Jing & Ming remind me of the Pola Bears at Seaworld Ping & Pong.

Khany wrote:Jing & Ming remind me of the Pola Bears at Seaworld  Ping & Pong.

Reminds me of a trip to Phuket....

Holy Moly wrote:

I've got you too - you were my highest scorer. Nice round 1 score btw - 983. How did this round go?

 My hero, Holy Moly!
A leaner 792 this week which is actually fairly competitive given some of the carnage. 
If you don’t rate the naughty EDG villains from this week: (Nanai, Tuilagi, Bullemor, Gilbert) then you had better trade me out because i’m gonna be doubling down on all of them again! 

multiple.scoregasms wrote:

If he is named to start I agree. I assumed the injury would have him missing this week if it was enough for him to come off

Can't find info of Bullemore injury anywhere - think it was only Rabbits who mentioned it.

Have to wait and see I guess. He was scoring fine at the time (20 in 32 mins) and hardly seemed like a guy that should have been hooked. It was the other Manly edge that was having all the troubles.

I gave Fanhub a serve about the ads in the match centre of the app being unusable on Saturday. Just got an email back saying they're aware of it and are working on a solution. How hard can it be to delete an ad?

Krump wrote:I gave Fanhub a serve about the ads in the match centre of the app being unusable on Saturday. Just got an email back saying they're aware of it and are working on a solution. How hard can it be to delete an ad?

Very hard if they have a contract and have accepted the cash for it

Krump wrote:I gave Fanhub a serve about the ads in the match centre of the app being unusable on Saturday. Just got an email back saying they're aware of it and are working on a solution. How hard can it be to delete an ad?

I’m assuming they have to have the ads to keep the app free for us.
Maybe they are looking at reducing the sizing down so it’s less intrusive?

Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:
I’m assuming they have to have the ads to keep the app free for us.
Maybe they are looking at reducing the sizing down so it’s less intrusive?

Yeah most likely this, devs would need to fix the sizing. It wouldn't be deemed urgent, devs ain't logging on over a weekend.

Just looks like a google pop up ad to me but I wouldn't know tbh. If they don't fix it I'll bee asking for my coach money back.
As much as the size is annoying thats not the real issue. The second you scroll at all you cant see the headers of the stat columns

lockout louckout louchitkt lockout locukotut