Moanaman wrote:
The definition of madness is doing the same thing and expecting a different result
So you say mate
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
Moanaman wrote:
The definition of madness is doing the same thing and expecting a different result
Ramitinmyhaaas wrote:For those that are bringing in Cleary this week, are you captaining him also?
Ramitinmyhaaas wrote:
Yeah thinking this way too mate, would be hoping for a 60+ from him easy
Rapture_NRL wrote:
If you don't Captain, it gives you a chance to reverse your trade if you get cold feet.... or that could be a good thing
Welshy wrote:Even with almost 300k in the kitty, only player I can realistically let go for Cleary is Cook.
and Cookie looked like he was going back to his running best
I would have Randall and Starling still, but not keen on letting him go
rhinoceroo wrote:
In some ways it's going to be harder for teams who've started well to get Cleary straight in because by definition they're less likely to have high-value players they want to trade (and it's too early for non-keeper cows like Randall or the Kings to have peaked).
Fortitude wrote:Is Angus an obvious out??
I don’t really know who to bring in for him.
Already have the kings and Leo.
Tempted to go left field and get rapana. Just love watching him play and rack up bullshit points.
Will generate a bit of Cleary. I’ve got no obvious route to Cleary at this stage, I’ll get him as soon as I can, sensibly. Need a good cheapie to come for maximum cash out.
Mr Snrub wrote:
If Angus is benched again then it's a no brainer to get rid of him. However I do think there's a chance he'll be back in a starting spot this week. Sitili defending next to Walker has been a bit of a weak point and Angus is a better defender so might see some team tinkering. Roosters haven't really got it right so far.
Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:
Should I be happy to own Mahoney and Crichton?
Rapture_NRL wrote:
If you don't Captain, it gives you a chance to reverse your trade if you get cold feet.... or that could be a good thing
rhinoceroo wrote:
In some ways it's going to be harder for teams who've started well to get Cleary straight in because by definition they're less likely to have high-value players they want to trade (and it's too early for non-keeper cows like Randall or the Kings to have peaked).
Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:
Should I be happy to own Mahoney and Crichton?
rhinoceroo wrote:
Yes!
Welshy wrote:Even with almost 300k in the kitty, only player I can realistically let go for Cleary is Cook.
and Cookie looked like he was going back to his running best
I would have Randall and Starling still, but not keen on letting him go
Aardvark wrote:
Angus went last week for Starling and Mahoney will be straight swapped for Cleary (maybe). I’m usually quite conservative but tbh very few fucks have been given about trading them out. Plus I really need a decent Captain
The decision was easy because of how they are scoring….if I had Haas and Ipap it would be much, much harder
Pookus McFly wrote:My team looks so good, but as of this week it will only look good for a Clearyless team- and everyone knows that doesn't count! Going to vindictively deathride this pointy chinned motherfucker harder than I have ever deathrided any other fantasy player, cranking the pettiness all the way up to 11.
Welshy wrote:
My ONLY worry is looking at this years halves with dominant KM, and not scoring as well as previous, but that has all ben factored into the cost hasn't it?
rhinoceroo wrote:
I've gone from "absolutely no trades. Be sensible, be patient" to "fuck it Fifi/Clifford to Cleary/Jones, I'm gonna have to trade him in at some point why not now" in the space of 30 minutes. Will probably change team 50 times before Tuesday, coinflip as to where it ends up.