Last minute downgrade from Carter to Pauli Pauli due to DPP and Souths having a thousand burgess' on their books.
2016 NRL.com Fantasy thread part 11
GreenMachine- Posts : 4549
Reputation : 2208
Join date : 2016-02-07
Age : 43
Location : Isle of Man
- Post n°881
Re: 2016 NRL.com Fantasy thread part 11
Rolling Lockout 1 Green Machine 0
Last minute downgrade from Carter to Pauli Pauli due to DPP and Souths having a thousand burgess' on their books.
Last minute downgrade from Carter to Pauli Pauli due to DPP and Souths having a thousand burgess' on their books.
Mulvy- Moderator
- Posts : 22374
Reputation : 13731
Join date : 2016-01-26
Location : Mulvania
- Post n°882
Re: 2016 NRL.com Fantasy thread part 11
Mighty Fishes wrote:Depending on Lichaa and how Slater does tomorrow im considering Lichaa to Garvey and Henry to Slater then pocket the 100k
Me too. Garvey in your 17?
m0nty (FanLeague)- Posts : 575
Reputation : 109
Join date : 2015-10-26
- Post n°883
Re: 2016 NRL.com Fantasy thread part 11
GreenMachine wrote:What sort of avg number of players we looking at for Monday night game? I assume I'm in for an early rankings tumble based on high number of Cam Smith armbands.
Other expected forum ownership:
Ah Mau
Packer (but potentially not in 17 for mid ranger teams)
JDB mentioned a little bit
Who else? Is Slater a sneaky POD people have?
I have Slater, Ah Mau and Smith (c) plus Bromwich to come. Currently ranked 56,590th.
RandomSil- Moderator
- Posts : 9953
Reputation : 3222
Join date : 2015-01-12
Age : 32
- Post n°884
Re: 2016 NRL.com Fantasy thread part 11
Clack Bocks wrote:632 with two to come. At this stage I'll be happy with 700
What two? I have 553 with C. Smith (C) and L. Ah Mau. :/
Mr Fernando- Posts : 565
Reputation : 125
Join date : 2015-07-31
- Post n°885
Re: 2016 NRL.com Fantasy thread part 11
GreenMachine wrote:What sort of avg number of players we looking at for Monday night game? I assume I'm in for an early rankings tumble based on high number of Cam Smith armbands.
Other expected forum ownership:
Ah Mau
Packer (but potentially not in 17 for mid ranger teams)
JDB mentioned a little bit
Who else? Is Slater a sneaky POD people have?
Kurt Mann could be another, got a bit of a mention around here.
m0nty (FanLeague)- Posts : 575
Reputation : 109
Join date : 2015-10-26
- Post n°886
Re: 2016 NRL.com Fantasy thread part 11
Popular players from MNF:
Smith 25%
R.Packer 25.6
Welch Nichol 24.7
Bromwich 21.7
Slater 21.6
Dugan 14
Mooper 11
Mann 10.5
Kennar 6
LAM 2.5 (!!!)
Smith 25%
R.Packer 25.6
Welch Nichol 24.7
Bromwich 21.7
Slater 21.6
Dugan 14
Mooper 11
Mann 10.5
Kennar 6
LAM 2.5 (!!!)
Showbags- Posts : 1217
Reputation : 150
Join date : 2016-01-29
- Post n°887
Re: 2016 NRL.com Fantasy thread part 11
498 with Captain Smith, LAM and Cooper to come. Should crack 700 barring MNF captains curse
Guest- Guest
- Post n°888
Re: 2016 NRL.com Fantasy thread part 11
mulvy wrote:
Me too. Garvey in your 17?
Either him J Saftini or Green.. Probably Garvery
Mulvy- Moderator
- Posts : 22374
Reputation : 13731
Join date : 2016-01-26
Location : Mulvania
- Post n°889
Re: 2016 NRL.com Fantasy thread part 11
Random wrote:
What two? I have 553 with C. Smith (C) and L. Ah Mau. :/
Gee our teams must be similar. I have 552 with the same players left
Mr Fernando- Posts : 565
Reputation : 125
Join date : 2015-07-31
- Post n°890
Re: 2016 NRL.com Fantasy thread part 11
608 with Capt Cam left
Liverpool_Bulldog- Fanatic
- Posts : 19477
Reputation : 6801
Join date : 2016-02-14
Location : New Zealand
- Post n°891
Re: 2016 NRL.com Fantasy thread part 11
560 with Mann and LAM. With the way this week is going I will not be surprised with a sub 600.
multiple.scoregasms- Fanatic
- Posts : 10288
Reputation : 7861
Join date : 2015-10-29
Age : 31
- Post n°892
Re: 2016 NRL.com Fantasy thread part 11
602 with Captain Cam to come. Thought I was having a shocker but there are lots in a similar position. Despite not getting the scores I was after happy with the minutes from those I picked. Points will come. Likely trades are Lichaa>Garvey and Henry>Trbojevic
multiple.scoregasms- Fanatic
- Posts : 10288
Reputation : 7861
Join date : 2015-10-29
Age : 31
- Post n°893
Re: 2016 NRL.com Fantasy thread part 11
GreenMachine wrote:Rolling Lockout 1 Green Machine 0
Last minute downgrade from Carter to Pauli Pauli due to DPP and Souths having a thousand burgess' on their books.
Rolling lockout had me reserving Niko over Carter. Not quite as bad as your decision
m0nty (FanLeague)- Posts : 575
Reputation : 109
Join date : 2015-10-26
- Post n°894
Re: 2016 NRL.com Fantasy thread part 11
So the answer to the earlier question seems to be that 700 is par this week.
Chewie- Fanatic
- Posts : 18003
Reputation : 12753
Join date : 2016-02-02
Location : Milenium Falcon
- Post n°895
Re: 2016 NRL.com Fantasy thread part 11
645 with LAM left... hopeful for some xtra points overnight. I don't think there will be many unaffected by the poor scores and injuries so it shouldn't be disastrous
Feline- Posts : 493
Reputation : 110
Join date : 2016-01-14
Location : Alley
- Post n°897
Re: 2016 NRL.com Fantasy thread part 11
m0nty (FanLeague) wrote:
I have Slater, Ah Mau and Smith (c) plus Bromwich to come. Currently ranked 56,590th.
Kurtis Mann would be in a few teams yet. I have him and Ah Mau.
m0nty (FanLeague)- Posts : 575
Reputation : 109
Join date : 2015-10-26
- Post n°898
Re: 2016 NRL.com Fantasy thread part 11
Just looking through player popularity, Benry is owned by 69.33% of teams. I feel better about that now.
RandomSil- Moderator
- Posts : 9953
Reputation : 3222
Join date : 2015-01-12
Age : 32
- Post n°899
Re: 2016 NRL.com Fantasy thread part 11
mulvy wrote:
Gee our teams must be similar. I have 552 with the same players left
At least there is one person I am beating.
m0nty (FanLeague)- Posts : 575
Reputation : 109
Join date : 2015-10-26
- Post n°900
Re: 2016 NRL.com Fantasy thread part 11
Of the long-term injured players:
Seggy 11%
Lichaa 8
Austin 6.8
Sezer 2.2
Gallen 12.8
Kahu 7.4
ARey 9.2
No really high numbers in there, actually.
Seggy 11%
Lichaa 8
Austin 6.8
Sezer 2.2
Gallen 12.8
Kahu 7.4
ARey 9.2
No really high numbers in there, actually.