MTB uses different numbers for the BE calca and the price change calca.
I don't know which is correct, but that's why there is a discrepancy
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
mattnz wrote:
Reed had a 63 average (excluding injured game) in 2021.
In the same season Cook 57, Grant 59. Just had a down year last year, now back up there with the best as top tier HOKs.
Pookus McFly wrote:Been a really rough start to the season, and most of it largely out of my control- a combination of the wrong centres in the wrong week and HIA/injuries alone have given me 76/6* over the two rounds so far and you just can’t compete putting up that kind of trash
*Blore 13, Ford 8, Smith 11, Alamoti 17, Talau 16, ITT 14
Need to keep reminding myself its a marathon and not a sprint, but being already so far behind the lead might make this a year to just have some fun and try to enjoy making some riskier plays without pressure. I cannot believe that fading HTF has become one of the defining moments of my seasons. Phins up!
mattnz wrote:
Reed had a 63 average (excluding injured game) in 2021.
In the same season Cook 57, Grant 59. Just had a down year last year, now back up there with the best as top tier HOKs.
Shady2K wrote:
I'd take 2021 averages with a grain of salt
Cleary averaged 92 and Turbo 83 also
Chucky wrote:Thanks for the responses, but one thing wasn’t covered.
How many banners incoming?
my tv broke wrote:Im thinking mahoney traders will end up disappoint.
Good luck all!
Shady2K wrote:
I'd take 2021 averages with a grain of salt
Cleary averaged 92 and Turbo 83 also
Bethany_B wrote:
Yup he's a good one. What sucks is that I also really want Kiraz, but realistically can't get them both. I do already have Walsh, Bird and Hammer so don't really need any more backs in my side for now.
Revraiser wrote:
Wasn't he looking a bust yesterday and then his score came gud ?
mattnz wrote:
Scorers couldn't keep up, went from 24 to 30 during half time.
Scorers have been slow in general this year I've noticed.mattnz wrote:
Scorers couldn't keep up, went from 24 to 30 during half time.
Revraiser wrote:
All good, just recall a quick glance and being surprised at one stage
mattnz wrote:
Loving feeling like I am a week ahead on trades and getting to pick up the marginal PODs that everyone else will miss.
Revraiser wrote:
As long as it doesn't affect your a top notch nitwit.
Camo123 wrote:
I was coming around 2700th last year in R9 and ended up finishing 139th
With the byes there’s definitely opportunities for gains (& losses) and no need to worry too much early on. Obviously some of these people that got on cash cows 1 week early might be better off