NRL Fantasy 2023 Part 16 - Does anyone have a case of Fig Jam? Looking to buy

mattnz wrote:"Bye round (13, 16 & 19) score reduced to 13 players (not 17), where 13 on field players will contribute to the total of the fantasy score, with standard auto-emergency substitution in play. Regular substitutions & trades can be done during the round"

This isn't particularly clear. Has there been a clarification at some point that players on the interchange won't count if they double up a position you already have covered in your 13?

Just want to make sure we aren't incorrectly assuming that is the case.

The Bludger#2 wrote:Genuine question - need some forum wisdom.
Was all set on going E.Butcher + Talau > Walsh + Preston
But, Tohu looks really tempting at $750k (season keeper middle and all that)
I could instead ditch the almighty Chin + Talau, keep E.Butcher another week and pick up Tohu + Preston.
Thoughts?
Arguments for / against Tohu / Walsh.

TU - stick with your original plan, Walsh + Preston
TD - go for broke, Tohu + Preston
(which would mean E.Butcher becomes Walsh next week, unless someone else is knocked out and will miss multiple rounds).

Cheers.

mattnz wrote:"Bye round (13, 16 & 19) score reduced to 13 players (not 17), where 13 on field players will contribute to the total of the fantasy score, with standard auto-emergency substitution in play. Regular substitutions & trades can be done during the round"

This isn't particularly clear. Has there been a clarification at some point that players on the interchange won't count if they double up a position you already have covered in your 13?

Just want to make sure we aren't incorrectly assuming that is the case.

robelgordo wrote:

Maybe reduces when Big Papy comes back

I think I’ve just about been talked into Leo. Knights have no one, and just read he was a centre in u20s, so he has the motor (I hope). All signs point to 50+ mins. Maybe.

robelgordo wrote:

Maybe reduces when Big Papy comes back

I think I’ve just about been talked into Leo. Knights have no one, and just read he was a centre in u20s, so he has the motor (I hope). All signs point to 50+ mins. Maybe.

The Bludger#2 wrote:Genuine question - need some forum wisdom.
Was all set on going E.Butcher + Talau > Walsh + Preston
But, Tohu looks really tempting at $750k (season keeper middle and all that)
I could instead ditch the almighty Chin + Talau, keep E.Butcher another week and pick up Tohu + Preston.
Thoughts?
Arguments for / against Tohu / Walsh.

TU - stick with your original plan, Walsh + Preston
TD - go for broke, Tohu + Preston
(which would mean E.Butcher becomes Walsh next week, unless someone else is knocked out and will miss multiple rounds).

Cheers.

robelgordo wrote:

Think if you do this, you have to look at the possibility that Cleary still averages 5-10 more (10-20 more as captain) then the alternatives over 10 weeks, so it’s really whether the other players make up for that

Finch wrote:

Surely Turgess instead of Sele?

mattnz wrote:"Bye round (13, 16 & 19) score reduced to 13 players (not 17), where 13 on field players will contribute to the total of the fantasy score, with standard auto-emergency substitution in play. Regular substitutions & trades can be done during the round"

This isn't particularly clear. Has there been a clarification at some point that players on the interchange won't count if they double up a position you already have covered in your 13?

Just want to make sure we aren't incorrectly assuming that is the case.

my tv broke wrote:Speaking of lower grades..

Milford 18 runs, 162 metres, a try and match winning fg, with 62 fantasy points in q cup. Hes back baby.

Mozer also in q cup team of the week. 52 points in 59 mins 2 x try assists.

my tv broke wrote:

It pretty clear in the guidelines. Only the 13 players on field count. Anyone on bench/NPR won't unless they are an auto-sub for a red dot on field.

If you have two hookers in round 13, you're not getting the points for the second one on the bench.

Revraiser wrote:

Yeah, it sounds vague and misleading. Why are they changing anything. U have the players u have.

Finch wrote:

What does this mean? In the big bye rounds, we only "need" 13 players, anymore and their score won't count into our score?

Aardvark wrote:

I know they are down on troops and he has moved into starting 13 but didn't they do this at some point last season? He still ended up playing max 40 mins, last week was the most minutes he has ever played.

At $400k I would like to see a game first

Finch wrote:

What does this mean? In the big bye rounds, we only "need" 13 players, anymore and their score won't count into our score?

Aardvark wrote:

Pretty much, but they have to be a 'starting 13' your bench won't count in the 13 unless they directly replace a red dot in the starting side

Revraiser wrote:

Which AI is this?

robelgordo wrote:

Were we you a page ago? Now I’m all confused and stuff. 6/10 panic levels here