Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:Latest trade is Butcher to Turbo. Don’t really want to lose Butcher but kinda hoping Katoa/Preston is a suitable enough combo moving forward
Great trade assuming Egan. Zero reason to hold on to him
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:Latest trade is Butcher to Turbo. Don’t really want to lose Butcher but kinda hoping Katoa/Preston is a suitable enough combo moving forward
mattnz wrote:I am expecting Crossland to pick up the 13 jersey this week and seriously looking at bringing him in.
Has scored great in the middle at HOK the last couple of weeks, could be a stop gap at HLF and should pick up a DPP of some description soon.
Knights just seem to keep losing players and he is likely to keep getting decent roles the next few weeks.
Mulvy wrote:
I don't know how I could have made my post any more ironic?![]()
multiple.scoregasms wrote:Looking at Doueihi and Doorey out for CHN and Lemuelu pending team lists
Leaves cash to grab Teddy next week
Need to turn some of these mids and edges into halves and hookers at some point
superbucks wrote:
The penny pinch idea might be the shot, they have a bit more meat on the bone. Katoa's a bit more helpful around MBR's if the plan is to hold, too.
Yea, I'd say you're right. But if I want to play it safe Katoa is the better this round given the %ownership. Garner's round 1 was awful though. A bit to think about, cheers for the replies.
robelgordo wrote:
I actually think this could happen and it will be fugly but profitable
Loomer wrote:
Why would they start Crossland at lock over Leo?
oh the ironing. Just like cheese he’s being looked at from two sides of the same coinsuperbucks wrote:
CHN is probs a trade out, yea. He's been tentative/lazy 3 weeks in a row. Not much aggression and hiding out there. I'll probably hold him for another week or two, not expecting the tide to turn tbh.
wolfking wrote:
Genuinely intrigued by this post mate. Why would he continue starting and besides an injury to Moylan, why would he partner him?
Loomer wrote:
Why would they start Crossland at lock over Leo?
my tv broke wrote:
Thats what I meant - Moylan probably does a hammy and hynes probably cops a week suspension the week moylan comes back, etc, and trindall just keeps bradbury'ing a starting spot.
Wont be by choice if all three are fit.
But i meant if moylan was injured and its 7 hynes 6 trindall, you probably wouldnt want to play trindall. Hed lose a lot of base to hynes
robelgordo wrote:
I’d say it’s unlikely but still a chance. Knights were an early adopter to the big mins, mobile lock - Watson then Mann, have clearly experimented with Crossland playing in various forward roles over the last year. They have no forwards left - their bench last week had three debutants I think.
mattnz wrote:
Every time I have traded in Wakeham, it has ended badly.
Aardvark wrote:
Someone was banging on about Crossland on the weekend. Not pretty but could be effective (50 tackles for zero misses…..and zero attacking stats)
my tv broke wrote:Wouldnt surprise me if crossland started 13. Makes sense.
Wouldnt surprise me if its Hetherington Leo and Croker starting middle. Raiders this week so they might opt for three big bodies to start against tapine and big papa (he said hes good to go this week)
I’m thinking C Grant if Munny is back or C Haas!Chewie wrote:I can't see Cleary go massive against the Eels, not at Commbank (I have a slight bias toward the Eels)
Neither can I see Turbo going massive against the Rabbitohs at Accor.
Chewie wrote:I can't see Cleary go massive against the Eels, not at Commbank (I have a slight bias toward the Eels)
Neither can I see Turbo going massive against the Rabbitohs at Accor.