by easytiger Sun Apr 09, 2023 7:13 am
Snatchpato wrote:Presuming I'm correct (particularly the last point)
@ynot is it possible to add a section which includes the pure average for each number of players played? Like I'd like to go into yafss and find out what is the average score for those who have played 10 players so I can also compare to that when evaluating my round progress (if that makes sense).
Isn't that exactly what it does?
Unless you're wanting the average across all 180,000+ teams? Which would probably grind any scraper to a halt.
I don't see the lines as projections, so much as a real time view of what has happened.
E.g
Those with 10 players including captain have averaged 556.
Those with 12 + C have averages out at 667, the difference being based on players played rather than any expectations on what your/my players may or may not score.
Using the top 1k is a great metric to give you an idea whether you are ahead of the curve or behind.
Back in the days of Steve Nicholls, he used to track scores into ranked groupings and to be honest it is rare if ever that the pack outperforms the top 1k as a whole - so I would suggest if you're ahead of the curve for your score/ players then generally you're in a good spot for rank improvement.
One final caveat; points on the board are generally a bit better for predicting your rank movement (points in the bank).
More players left give you more opportunity to jump, but also more opportunity to slip.
If you're remaining players are high ownership, then where you are with regard to the yafss averages is probably a great indicator as you are mostly moving with the group.
If you are full of pods, then anything could happen...
TLDR: Yes, Camo you are ahead of the 1k curve
Home
