NRL Fantasy 2023 Part 35 - Man U need to consider Joseph now

Is there anywhere nsw cup stats are compiled rather then having to go through every game?
Nvm found it.

EKatoa????? What happened???

I did not watch the game. No run metres to speak of, no tackle breaks, above average missed tackles.
Anti-base stats

Who are people keeping out of Loiero and Ekatoa?

EKatoa has a higher ceiling, but more volatile scores. Loeiro plods along nicely with a lower base.

BEs suggest ditching Katoa first, unless you consider him a kepper that you'll hold on to.
But think i'll ditch him this week and wait and see on Loeiro

Cartwright plays early so can wait and see before deciding to trade him or not

Honey Badger wrote:Wow Eels 5 day turnaround and having to play in Darwin. They've had a tough draw to start with

Could have played two weeks back to back at home in Parra, but have decided to take a home match to the NT. Their call on that one.

Milchcow wrote:
Who are people keeping out of Loiero and Ekatoa?

EKatoa has a higher ceiling, but more volatile scores. Loeiro plods along nicely with a lower base.

BEs suggest ditching Katoa first, unless you consider him a kepper that you'll hold on to.
But think i'll ditch him this week and wait and see on Loeiro

Cartwright plays early so can wait and see before deciding to trade him or not

I'm holding Loiero for now because I can get Manu in one trade selling Katoa, while I can't do it with Loiero.

if Loiero gets another 50+ then I'll hold him through his bye and sell in R13, otherwise I'm selling next week (Tapine if I can reach him, but more likely Cheese or some other cheaper MID)

The Dolphin Conspiracies wrote:EKatoa????? What happened???

I did not watch the game. No run metres to speak of, no tackle breaks, above average missed tackles.
Anti-base stats

Needs Munny at 6 to feed him the ball

mickspicks wrote:

Needs Munny at 6 to feed him the ball

Katoa runs off Hughes so Munster in theory shouldn't matter to him. It's Loiero that runs off Munster.

wolfking wrote:Still kinda tempted to trade Carty even if he does start.  Being able to do him to Manu in a single trade is actually really enticing.

Hard to do this yet until we hear of what was the reason for dropping Walker. Was it because of poor form or is it simply to give him a rest. If its form then you would presume it will be Manu's spot to make a claim on. If its to give Walker a rest, you may have 2-3 weeks of Manu at 5/8th.

The Dolphin Conspiracies wrote:EKatoa????? What happened???

I did not watch the game. No run metres to speak of, no tackle breaks, above average missed tackles.
Anti-base stats

Just a shite game all around really. I thought he actually showed a lot of effort, the Storm just had 0 attacking ball and it was pissing rain. I was pretty happy to check his score and he managed to squeak out a 33

mickspicks wrote:

Needs Munny at 6 to feed him the ball

I think Munster plays on the opposite side and Hughes plays next to Katoa.

Finger Puppet Mafia wrote:

Could have played two weeks back to back at home in Parra, but have decided to take a home match to the NT. Their call on that one.

What a bunch of shit cunts they are. Imagine trying to grow the game.

Finger Puppet Mafia wrote:

Hard to do this yet until we hear of what was the reason for dropping Walker. Was it because of poor form or is it simply to give him a rest. If its form then you would presume it will be Manu's spot to make a claim on. If its to give Walker a rest, you may have 2-3 weeks of Manu at 5/8th.

All true. He's a gun though at 600K, it's still a decent trade if you want to lock up one of those positions.

I like the idea of doing EKAt to Manu, but it just means I'd have IKat at 16 and Alamoti at 17 this week, which doesn't really seem ideal.

mrbrownstone wrote:I like the idea of doing EKAt to Manu, but it just means I'd have IKat at 16 and Alamoti at 17 this week, which doesn't really seem ideal.

Alamoti's fine as long as he doesn't get moved to the wing midgame, I would just do it.

Krump wrote:
What a bunch of shit cunts they are. Imagine trying to grow the game.

Pretty sure they get an extremely good financial package/incentive to play a game in the NT. I am sure Toursim NT is or was a sponsor for a long time as well. And no doubt, I am sure you are smart enough to understand that Parra are not going to the NT to grow the game. But yes, I agree, it would be nice if we lived in a land of lollipops and chocolate kisses and not a land of "shit cunts" who have very little underlying interest in growing the game in the NT.

Bethany_B wrote:

Katoa runs off Hughes so Munster in theory shouldn't matter to him. It's Loiero that runs off Munster.

True. Idk why but EKat seems better with Munny at 6.

Finger Puppet Mafia wrote:

Pretty sure they get an extremely good financial package/incentive to play a game in the NT. I am sure Toursim NT is or was a sponsor for a long time as well. I am sure you are smart enough to understand that Parra are not going to the NT to grow the game. But yes, I agree, it would be nice if we lived in a land of lollipops and chocolate kisses.

Of course there are incentives. That doesn’t change the fact that they are doing the right thing by the game without being forced to. If other teams did the same thing the game would be in a better position.

Tale's spot on warriors bench looks better.  Even with Barnett yet to return.

Couchman a no go still ?

The Dolphin Conspiracies wrote:EKatoa????? What happened???

I did not watch the game. No run metres to speak of, no tackle breaks, above average missed tackles.
Anti-base stats

From what I could tell, Munster kept going left to Pezet, Loiero and Coates side and attacking Harper to no success. Hughes and EKatoa didn't see as much ball as I'd hoped, but Warbrick did stroll over untouched on one of the few times Storm went right.

3 games in nsw cup for Bula, thanks but no thanks. The dogs winger gets what 3 games?
I guess Dunster is still sitting there