NRL Fantasy 2023 Part 36 - At the going down of the sun

Reklaw wrote:

Only on 55 with a try, would've expected him to be on much more

Has been a letdown for me this year for sure mate.

SoylentGreen wrote:

He's short-changed on tackle counts regularly, but it's been ridiculous this week.

How do they define try savers this year. I thought I saw two of them

rhinoceroo wrote:

He was about two metres away! Legit updates incoming. Can't moan too much about high 50s and missing 6-8 points in goalkicking which we had no idea about pre-game.

Hosking made his BE. Can't really hold a 700k+ edge getting 60 minutes though. Thanks for the 270k and cash down to Lane...

I think you have to give him another game to see.

Who was talking up a punt on alex johnston? Looks good

wolfking wrote:

I think you have to give him another game to see.

Yeah unless he gets dropped or something, he's getting one more game to prove himself.

filthridden wrote:EasyTiger has Mitchell and is up to 7th live rank.

Go ET!

My favourite mod!

So we all buying (And some of us re-buying) Latrell next week?

Shady2K wrote:

Need to look at this shit until next Wednesday

thats rough

Hell of a game, enjoyed that a lot.

Pretty meh in terms of fantasy scorers though. At least Hosking made his BE but that's a concern. 55 from Cleary is fine but underwhelming. And Cook only getting 53 with a try, when he was on 41 at HT is disappointing.

Could have been worse I guess, feeling for Host traders.

The Dolphin Conspiracies wrote:

How do they define try savers this year. I thought I saw two of them

Dunno about the first one, I think the full back was coming across also, but that second one Latrell goes under the sticks if he doesn’t make that effort and I’m sure those have been given before, we really need someone in the know to ask the people that know to clarify exactly what a try-save is, because none of us have any idea and it looks an awful lot like they’re making it up as they go

Finch wrote:So we all buying (And some of us re-buying) Latrell next week?

A little hard to justify now, misses a lot of games over Origin

wolfking wrote:

I think you have to give him another game to see.

That's fair. Lane going down in price anyway unless he goes ballistic tomorrow.

Host is a morale player, keeps everyone's spirits up.

rhinoceroo wrote:

That's fair. Lane going down in price anyway unless he goes ballistic tomorrow.

If he starts of course.

the_great_wobbler wrote:

A little hard to justify now, misses a lot of games over Origin

Plays the next 4 at least

Worst case scenario, he's going to make quite a bit of cash in that time, no?

syn13 wrote:

Dunno about the first one, I think the full back was coming across also, but that second one Latrell goes under the sticks if he doesn’t make that effort and I’m sure those have been given before, we really need someone in the know to ask the people that know to clarify exactly what a try-save is, because none of us have any idea and it looks an awful lot like they’re making it up as they go

Well, we could ask and they'd say "we're making it up as we go".

The Goat Boys wrote:I forgot to trade in Host

I will now play indoor cricket for the rest of my life.

I was trading him in for sure, Indoor game started a bit early and didn't get it done.

What a fluke

Anyway - good start to the week 187 for 2 (C) Only way is down from here - but certainly cannot complain with the start. Latrell will be almost back to what I paid for him now with a very low BE

5/266c after tonight's game, I'm up to 23rd overall but I suspect this might be as high as I get this week, since Cook, Muz and Cleary (C) all somewhat underperformed, and I also played Soni Luke.

YAFSS has me below average for now, but we'll see how the rest of the round goes, and I'm hoping Fifita can break his tryscoring drought and get the big 100 he's been threatening to get for a while now.

In other news, I’ll be having a lot closer look at Ipap this weekend, sooner than I was hoping, thought I could make it past his Round 13 bye with all my mid-priced EDGs but they seem to be peaking at the same time and threatening to go backwards.