NRL Fantasy 2023 Part 39 - Host is still playable, right?

mattnz wrote:
Yep, $300k buy in reserves, not a problem of host proportions. Still got big minutes and made 30 tackles, just a few negatives

20 minutes off the bench next week, assuming Payten hasn't gone insane.

mattnz wrote:
Yep, $300k buy in reserves, not a problem of host proportions. Still got big minutes and made 30 tackles, just a few negatives

Nah, you broke him.

mattnz wrote:
Yep, $300k buy in reserves, not a problem of host proportions. Still got big minutes and made 30 tackles, just a few negatives

Come on let's be honest, in hindsight it was a pretty poor pick? A 50 minute lock running for a total of 21 metres...

mickspicks wrote:Robson 50+ is nice. Granny, well, for that game got to take it.

Nanai is going to miss 3+ weeks for that one, maybe more. The fact he swung around doesn't help him. They'll crack down on that especially if Uele has to sit on the sidelines.

Hess should be getting a few weeks too, but they are soft on foot trips

Take Niko over Granvilles 25 yeah?

my tv broke wrote:Im bad at this game but im not 'buy granville' bad

I fat fingered a downvote when I meant to upvote, stupid mobile browser

Khany wrote:Let the Nicho jizz fest commence

*Standard tries to insert obligatory Randy Marsh meme*

Krump wrote:Tigers and raiders get to fight over Walker and Townsend next year? Yes please to either

There is no Tier 1 halves on the market. Who these clubs should be chasing is Brayden Trindall. Too good a half to be playing in reserve grade.

Mulvy wrote:

Milchcow wrote:

Koroisau has lost as many games with the Tigers as he lost when he was at Penrith

I'm sure that's made up, but impressive either way.

7 losses in 3 years followed by 7 losses in 7 games

He actually lost more at Penrith if you include his first stint in 2015. But he's lost as many club games in 2023 so far as in the previous 3 years put together


edit: it says he has a draw this year because it seems to be considering this week's game, which is currently a 0:0 draw

mickspicks wrote:Robson 50+ is nice. Granny, well, for that game got to take it.

Nanai is going to miss 3+ weeks for that one, maybe more. The fact he swung around doesn't help him. They'll crack down on that especially if Uele has to sit on the sidelines.

Am I the only one who thinks Nanai also pulled BHU down by his genitals?

mattnz wrote:
Yep, $300k buy in reserves, not a problem of host proportions. Still got big minutes and made 30 tackles, just a few negatives

Didn't you talk him all night and backed him in for 40+ and you are now saying you didn't even play him?
Is your team that good you can afford to play him in the NPR?

Do you sell used cars or insurance for a living by chance?

mattnz wrote:
Yep, $300k buy in reserves, not a problem of host proportions. Still got big minutes and made 30 tackles, just a few negatives

Potato.

Ando wrote:

Come on let's be honest, in hindsight it was a pretty poor pick? A 50 minute lock running for a total of 21 metres...

Not at all. Got the kind of role as expected. Will have up and down weeks like any player. Still making cash, even more forwards out next week.

Milchcow wrote:

Mulvy wrote:

Milchcow wrote:

Koroisau has lost as many games with the Tigers as he lost when he was at Penrith

I'm sure that's made up, but impressive either way.

7 losses in 3 years followed by 7 losses in 7 games

He actually lost more at Penrith if you include his first stint in 2015. But he's lost as many club games in 2023 so far as in the previous 3 years put together


edit: it says he has a draw this year because it seems to be considering this week's game, which is currently a 0:0 draw

Nice.

mattnz wrote:
Hess should be getting a few weeks too, but they are soft on foot trips

idk, it was pretty blatant. He may sit a week.

Robson/Granville rolling score watch: Robson +30

Regulator wrote:

If you only think about Koroisau second tenure with the Panthers it isn't made up. He lost 7 games in three seasons.

However he was also at Penrith for a season years ago where he lost more.

I think I owned him in my first year in 2016, he was one of three in contention and two got injured in like the first week or two. And there was a "train" a bunch of us jumped on for a few weeks. Can't remember his name.

Contrastinghobby wrote:

Didn't you talk him all night and backed him in for 40+ and you are now saying you didn't even play him?
Is your team that good you can afford to play him in the NPR?

Do you sell used cars or insurance for a living by chance?

He was a $300K buy in position 19 as a cash cow. Is your team so poor he would need to have played in your 17?

Nice Niko nice

mattnz wrote:
Not at all. Got the kind of role as expected. Will have up and down weeks like any player. Still making cash, even more forwards out next week.

He's going to make you about $50 if you got on this week. I won't waste my time arguing because I know by now you are never going to admit it wasn't the best pick does this fall into the bad luck category?