NRL Fantasy 2023 Part 39 - Host is still playable, right?

mattnz wrote:
He was a $300K buy in position 19 as a cash cow. Is your team so poor he would need to have played in your 17?

my tv broke wrote:Im bad at this game but im not 'buy granville' bad

GarethEllisismyDad wrote:287/3 (c) hynes, mcinnes and wilton,

not had much to cheer fantasy wise so indulge me

standard-issue wrote:

*Standard tries to insert obligatory Randy Marsh meme*

syn13 wrote:We were all talking Granville when we should’ve been talking the Jetski, don’t look now but he’s actually making money!

Milchcow wrote:



7 losses in 3 years followed by 7 losses in 7 games

He actually lost more at Penrith if you include his first stint in 2015. But he's lost as many club games in 2023 so far as in the previous 3 years put together


edit: it says he has a draw this year because it seems to be considering this week's game, which is currently a 0:0 draw

Regulator wrote:I got the 45k out of Granville last week so doesn't hurt quite as much. But if he keeps that same role, he should still get to the point he is worth the trade.

Of course, will he keep that role is another question, but his whole team got fucking reamed and they're going to have at least one if not two forwards so decent chance he keeps ticking along.

I totally think Payten is the type to stick with him.

mattnz wrote:

Yep, role maintained is the most important for a cash cow, people are reacting like he was Host or Couch bad.

Loomer wrote:Granville outscored popular podcast buy this week, Cotter. I'll take the 219/2 with Granville in my 17 that got me Hynes C

Mulvy wrote:Does 0/0 impress anyone?

wolfking wrote:

We must have had the exact same players as I have the same score.

Mulvy wrote:Does 0/0 impress anyone?

Milchcow wrote:

Interesting he was a popular podcast buy. Was he mentioned even once on here?

Mulvy wrote:Katoa or Nikorima in for Granville's 25? Katoa yeah? Or Bula? Nah not Bula, surely?