NRL Fantasy 2023 Part 73 - 98% Stand and Applaud

Really regret getting on Cleary early and captaining, he looks a bit of a passenger out there, will struggle to hit 50 points

Playing Boyd over MKing is getting worse and worse. Yuck.

Mulvy wrote:

I was half watching. Was it a kick return? Won't get either if that's the case.

Usually they do give them for kick returns though, and he busted 2 tackles, offloaded the ball to To'o who got into space and scored, meaning he should have 2x TB (given) + OLTH (given) + LBA (given) + TA (not given yet)

Bethany_B wrote:

If he got the LBA, he should get the TA. Only time where they should ever be giving them separately is if the guy who got the LB didn't score the try (got tackled or passed the ball etc.)

It’s not a TA, To’o had too much to do. Was still a good scoring play

There you go DEdwards owners

Ando wrote:

It’s not a TA, To’o had too much to do. Was still a good scoring play

It is a TA and Failhub are wrong to not give him that. LBAs where the guy breaking the line goes on to score without being tackled should be given TAs by definition.

One more reason why SC and VSDT do it better.

Mulvy wrote:

An empathetic post

Have an upvote.

Haven’t you usually run out of upvotes by this time of the day Mulvy? Or have you got SI to increase the quota?

Bethany_B wrote:

It is a TA and Failhub are wrong to not give him that. LBAs where the guy breaking the line goes on to score without being tackled should be given TAs by definition.

One more reason why SC and VSDT do it better.

Hi. I own Edwards. It wasn't a TA from 70m from the line, hth.

rhinoceroo wrote:

Hi. I own Edwards. It wasn't a TA from 70m from the line, hth.

It shouldn't matter how far away from the line it is, if he puts him into space then it's a damn try assist.

If that was Stinkwater or Teddy, they would have been given the TA.

Bethany_B wrote:

It is a TA and Failhub are wrong to not give him that. LBAs where the guy breaking the line goes on to score without being tackled should be given TAs by definition.

One more reason why SC and VSDT do it better.

Have you considered making SuperCoach your fantasy platform of choice?

Bethany_B wrote:

It shouldn't matter how far away from the line it is, if he puts him into space then it's a damn try assist.

If that was Stinkwater or Teddy, they would have been given the TA.

It's not a TA you're grasping at air, let it go

He's up to 35 all of a sudden as well

AL wrote:

Haven’t you usually run out of upvotes by this time of the day Mulvy? Or have you got SI to increase the quota?

Haha, nah. Actually found some motivation today and did some yard work. Just catching up.

Krump wrote:
Have you considered making SuperCoach your fantasy platform of choice?

I play all three formats

Bethany_B wrote:

It shouldn't matter how far away from the line it is, if he puts him into space then it's a damn try assist.

If that was Stinkwater or Teddy, they would have been given the TA.

It's not and they wouldn't.

Just enjoy the fact he's got 35 points in the last 15 minutes and let it go.

rhinoceroo wrote:

Hi. I own Edwards. It wasn't a TA from 70m from the line, hth.

I mean, it's more of a TA than a line break assist, given there was no line to break, because it was from a kick. He did assist a try though...

I'm an owner too, hopeful, but unlikely I think.

Edwards on 35 out of nowhere

Finch wrote:Edwards on 35 out of nowhere

Broke the line and got some TBs from it, that's where it came from.

Bethany_B wrote:

It is a TA and Failhub are wrong to not give him that. LBAs where the guy breaking the line goes on to score without being tackled should be given TAs by definition.

One more reason why SC and VSDT do it better.

Moan moan moan moan

Cleary junk time might need to start a little earlier today.

Talakai is out of the 17 completely