NRL Fantasy 2023 Part 73 - 98% Stand and Applaud

He'll get a TA because its Cleary

Cleary TA for that?  

That is laughable defence lol

If Dedwards wasn't a TA, there's no chance Cleary get's a TA there.

Although he his Cleary so he may be blessed

Shady2K wrote:Talakai is out of the 17 completely

Bugger, thought I was a genius bringing him in in draft this week.

mattnz wrote:He'll get a TA because its Cleary

Similar to the Manu TA for Collins try yesterday that got paid, don’t think they should as an owner of both

He got it

Ando wrote:

Similar to the Manu TA for Collins try yesterday that got paid, don’t think they should as an owner of both

Manu drew a fair few defenders in though which created space

Cleary did none of the work there, all Crichton and the dogs defence MIA

Shady2K wrote:He got it

What an absolute rort from Failhub as usual

Bethany_B wrote:

What an absolute rort from Failhub as usual

At least complain about the right company

Would anyone just play Colq to avoid Bulas 28 or trade VTW to Garrick or DCE?

Someone on MTB Website has marked Kiraz & Skelton as swapping positions but they haven't

wolfking wrote:Would anyone just play Colq to avoid Bulas 28 or trade VTW to Garrick or DCE?

I'm doing VTW - Garrick

Meh

wolfking wrote:Would anyone just play Colq to avoid Bulas 28 or trade VTW to Garrick or DCE?

VTW to either sounds like a nice trade

Welsh Mafia wrote:

Manu drew a fair few defenders in though which created space

Cleary did none of the work there, all Crichton and the dogs defence MIA

Neither should really be a TA when the try scorers have so much work to do, based on the last few years of me playing this game. I’m not going to complain as I own both but so much inconsistency from the scorers.

If To’o had a clear run to the try line, Edwards TA would have been paid but he had to beat the full back

wolfking wrote:Would anyone just play Colq to avoid Bulas 28 or trade VTW to Garrick or DCE?

VTW to DCE in isolation is a good trade

Finch wrote:Someone on MTB Website has marked Kiraz & Skelton as swapping positions but they haven't

Oh right? Ill delete it. I just approved as im not watching

wolfking wrote:Would anyone just play Colq to avoid Bulas 28 or trade VTW to Garrick or DCE?

Yes

wolfking wrote:Would anyone just play Colq to avoid Bulas 28 or trade VTW to Garrick or DCE?

Fitz said in the presser Colq trained all preseason at back row so that’s positive. Talakai dropping out means he should get some decent game time I’d have thought. 

Although if you can do VTW to Garrick I think that’s a safe play

my tv broke wrote:

Oh right? Ill delete it. I just approved as im not watching

Sounds like the Cleary TA