rhinoceroo wrote:
Think there's a bit of hopium around Smithies' role/minutes when they have young players who've been in their system for longer that can fill in well. In these interviews Fogarty and Whitehead both namecheck "Ata"(Mariota) and "Trey"(Mooney), not Smithies. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qAgEn94moKE
Also in that interview, Fogarty mentions both Weekes and Strange as possible halves partners, but Whitehead singles out Strange.
Try this speculation instead (without having any real clue who the hookers will be. Could be Levi. And it might be Hosking on the bench because he can cover centre):
Papalii 40
HookerA 50
Tapine 55
Young 80
Whitehead 70
Hors 60
HookerB 30
Mariota 40
Mooney 30
Hosking/Smithies 25
That would make Mariota the most interesting, but there's a limit to how many Raiders cows you can comfortably hold.
This is the main issue I am facing with considering Smithies.
I'm sure he's going to be an excellent middie eventually, someone likened him to the great Feansom, but with Strange, Weekes, Stewart, and Fog-god in the mix that's too many Raiders to carry.