NRL Fantasy 2024 Part 3 - Half the height we want

the_great_wobbler wrote:

Do you mean harder? Isn't it easier to set up your team how you want with more money to spend elsewhere?

the_great_wobbler wrote:

What about 20 midrangers plus Cleary?

WT Winfield wrote:

Hey, I'm working on it. Trying to punt Carrigan for someone the past days, then I can focus on getting rid of Haas too.

my tv broke wrote:

One does not simply punt Carrigan

WT Winfield wrote:

21 midrangers has never been a viable strategy

Mulvy wrote:

You spelled sub-gun PODs wrong.

WT Winfield wrote:

Matt's Midrangers has such a fine ring to it though. That's what I've always read it as anyway if I'm clicking view more in the FOG.

mattnz wrote:

No I would rather others find it harder to get guys like Grant and Haas in their team. My team is well balanced with paying for a mid priced CTR.

my tv broke wrote:My team is very awesome in February too

Let me guess...:

Honeysett wrote:Classic NRL with a rule change. Commentators are talking about how eyes on the ball in a contest doesn't matter if you're no legit chance at the ball, Bunker says "he's always got eyes on the ball, so playing on" within the same breath

The Dolphin Conspiracies wrote:Tuilagi is playing well. if he starts he would be straight in but i cannot see him getting a start over carty and Lane

Honeysett wrote:Classic NRL with a rule change. Commentators are talking about how eyes on the ball in a contest doesn't matter if you're no legit chance at the ball, Bunker says "he's always got eyes on the ball, so playing on" within the same breath

WT Winfield wrote:

Yeah not sure what the point of the new rule is.. just trying to appear like they're actively doing something.

Bloke jumps way too low, too early and takes out the two Raiders, so his teammate can score

Obbeats wrote:

https://youtu.be/zusUnR1g3iM?feature=shared