whall15 wrote:It's interesting, I just put a supercoach team together for the first time in years and after looking at the supercoach pages this morning, they were all convinced that Strange would get the start over Weekes.
That's....... Strange
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
whall15 wrote:It's interesting, I just put a supercoach team together for the first time in years and after looking at the supercoach pages this morning, they were all convinced that Strange would get the start over Weekes.
Ramitinmyhaaas wrote:Hey guys got 630k to spend on a good centre, do we reckon Penis is the best option around that price tag? Could go Aitken if he's starting or a Timoko but I've already got too many raiders players...
Yet again out of trades wrote:every year i have 1 pick that everyone is against and i dont follow my gut then kick myself that i didn't just back it and i will probably regret it but im running luke brooks I think he gets back to strong running game and breaks the shackles that the tigers have had him in. he got picked over teddy and mosses for a reason its his turn to kick on lol.
Camo123 wrote:Anyone else remarkably calm about their selections
I’m pretty sure I’ve lost my 2023 curse
Camo123 wrote:Anyone else remarkably calm about their selections
I’m pretty sure I’ve lost my 2023 curse
Except they do fellow members of the club lol on Facebook groups and Souths forums. That’s why I make it hidden so you don’t have to read if you don’t want.Aardvark Ratnick wrote:
Bunny supporters aint reading that !!!
Camo123 wrote:Anyone else remarkably calm about their selections
I’m pretty sure I’ve lost my 2023 curse
L-Jimmy wrote:
I'm chill with everything, besides my call to take Piakura over Luki.
I think it's a mistake, and that Luki will score better. It also goes against my rule of grabbing all cheap starting edges.
But Piakura is mildly injured and not amazingly good... also good fade against the herd.
Tick tock Mr. Bond......
mattnz wrote:
Despite not having Haas, I am expecting him to score well in the game conditions today. Will just ignore what he does today, knowing a single round won't make his season.
Loomer wrote:
I thought everyone had both
GreenSchist wrote:
It's a fine line and a lot of the time, I think PODing is overated.
When player ownership percentages are so high, I would much rather be part of the pack. If it fails, at least you've failed with the pack and likely wont lose much in the way of standing/rankings.
The exception to this would be someone like Haas, where going against the pack allows WAY more cash flexibility to strengthen the rest of your roster. Theres also plenty of mid alternatives who could theoretically reach the same heights as Haas but for cheaper.
Essentially, PODing can work out in your favour but the safer option is to follow the pack and fail/succeed together.
The Amateurs did a really good break down of this, allocating it as a percentage breakdown and it very clearly shows the stats favour following the herd.
the_great_wobbler wrote:
I think the main point that isn't made enough in these discussions is that going with the pack is usually the right thing to do because the pack is more often than not correct. All the square things with good bad outcomes etc I think are rubbish and try to quantise a decision too much by giving equal weighting to the different combinations. Trying to be different just to be different is where you get lost in the weeds.
I think there's also an interesting phenomenon now with the proliferation of information sources where these sources tend to skew the selections of teams despite these content creators not actually being particularly better at the game than a lot of their listeners. That's why this forum is so powerful, you get a back and forth and ideas can be challenged and discussed.
Having said that I don't think you can win without making some moves that the crowd doesn't, case in point Booze jumping off Millar early, grabbing Gutherson over the bye rounds etc. These weren't high percentage (in terms of popularity) trades but they really really paid off.
whall15 wrote:Both teams 1-17
Alfie wrote:Murray looks tired as fuck