NRL Fantasy 2024 Part 12 - No need for a restart

BroncosSabres wrote:Didn’t this happen briefly with Hopgood last year, everyone traded him out, and then he continued to be a gun? Sell at your own risk.

rhinoceroo wrote:Chan could certainly have looked for the ball more, but he was a rookie second row defending next to a rookie half against the best edge attack (Cleary/Martin/Tago) in the game and they kept the three-time premiers completely scoreless. If Bellamy drops him after that, he's a pretty fucking harsh marker.*

(*yeah, I know Craig Bellamy probably is a ridiculously harsh marker)

Aardvark wrote:

I didn't captain Haas but it's fine....I picked you in fantasy fantasy

BroncosSabres wrote:Didn’t this happen briefly with Hopgood last year, everyone traded him out, and then he continued to be a gun? Sell at your own risk.

Goodnight Kiwi wrote:Well it looks like Aitken in at centre will be a popular trade for most:

"The Dolphins face being without back-rower Connelly Lemuelu for an extended period after he suffered a suspected dislocated kneecap in the opening-round loss to the Cowboys."

And a downgrade of a misfiring gun to afford. Which gun may be the early big call

mattnz wrote:

Munster situation sounds bad. Has a groin issue, they can't find it in scans and don't know what the issue is. Pezet might be there for a few weeks.

Trading is easy, choosing which sauce to get out of the fridge is harder:

easytiger wrote:

There's merit to holding Hopgood, but I've always been of the opinion that sometimes you have to get on the front foot with Fantasy, and sometimes you have to sit back and let it come to you - the trick is knowing when to do which haha

Goodnight Kiwi wrote:Well it looks like Aitken in at centre will be a popular trade for most:

"The Dolphins face being without back-rower Connelly Lemuelu for an extended period after he suffered a suspected dislocated kneecap in the opening-round loss to the Cowboys."

And a downgrade of a misfiring gun to afford. Which gun may be the early big call

lukeayee wrote:Chan actually looked like a good forward though.

Salmon, was a salmon.

Toothlessshark wrote:How much weight do you put into the sharks rotations. McInnes with 2/3 of bugger all mins and Finucane the same boat. Makes me think it'll be different next week but maybe not better for mcinnes

L-Jimmy wrote:Quietly happy with Berry for a tryless 40. Couple of offloads, couple of TBs ..and 5 kick metres! Looking forward to heaps of FDOs in future

Milchcow wrote:

Salmon was scoring well until he got shafted to the backs.

Don't know what his actual minutes will look like, but I wouldn't knee jerk him out based solely on that game

(Instead knee jerk him out when he is named on the bench tomorrow)

Camo123 wrote:

You could just state an example of a player it’s happened to

multiple.scoregasms wrote:

Looked the best of the next tier up from base centres. Although it's a pretty small list with Reimis, Arthars, Berry, Montoya and Niu

Will probably get some attacking stats at some point

quicksand wrote:

Clint Newton ?
So they wouldn't have to upgrade his contract for playing X amount of games !!

rhinoceroo wrote:Chan could certainly have looked for the ball more, but he was a rookie second row defending next to a rookie half against the best edge attack (Cleary/Martin/Tago) in the game and they kept the three-time premiers completely scoreless. If Bellamy drops him after that, he's a pretty fucking harsh marker.*

(*yeah, I know Craig Bellamy probably is a ridiculously harsh marker)