Round 13 = 856
Round 16 = 924
Gives you an idea what can be done
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
White Lightning wrote:
angus to d. fifita rd 14
Liverpool_Bulldog wrote:Only 4 of the 20 highest scoring players (total points) in the game are available this week.
And none of them are in the top 10. I’m guessing we’re gonna have some stinker scores
Boozecluez wrote:Last year in the first couple byes with 13 players
Round 13 = 856
Round 16 = 924
Gives you an idea what can be done
Loomer wrote:
Wasn't it 17 players until this season?
WT Winfield wrote:
Hmm too cheap to be considered risky in my book, same with Hands. Should at least get what you pay for and potential for high upside.
Preston was one of my favourites to watch last year, so I like taking the gamble that he'll cement his spot again. Bloke's a footy player.
Boozecluez wrote:Last year in the first couple byes with 13 players
Round 13 = 856
Round 16 = 924
Gives you an idea what can be done
mrbrownstone wrote:Anyone else on captain Sam Walker?
Probably between him or Dylan Brown for my team.
Pretty tempted, but it's definitely a rocks or diamonds play with him.
my tv broke wrote:there is a direct correlation with amount of times you mentionPODinjury vs how bad your rank is.
Pookus McFly wrote:A few years ago I hit exactly 1000 points on the major bye round whilst playing 16 players (old system). I still think about that round on lonely nights.
my tv broke wrote:there is a direct correlation with amount of times you mention POD vs how bad your rank is.
mrbrownstone wrote:Is Piakura to Tuilagi a no-brainer to field 13?
Feel like I'm overthinking it looking at Preston, Sorenson, Lem etc.
Boozecluez wrote:Last year in the first couple byes with 13 players
Round 13 = 856
Round 16 = 924
Gives you an idea what can be done
robelgordo wrote:
Yeah I was making up numbers in my head to get to 580... if I used actual averages its 605. Includes Hands being way low, and I thought of subbing in Lussick's average instead, but I also have guys like Weekes and Amrstrong at small sample averages of 50+ which I can't see happening to offset
my tv broke wrote:there is a direct correlation with amount of times you mention POD vs how bad your rank is.