No Worries wrote:
Summary: After a few good weeks, the wheels have fallen off and we would be lucky to beat the Broncos. Watch the olympics instead.
I’ll be at the game mate
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
No Worries wrote:
Summary: After a few good weeks, the wheels have fallen off and we would be lucky to beat the Broncos. Watch the olympics instead.
White Lightning wrote:this is my wife's team ranked at 281 with 4 trades left with 198k bank.
cook
carrigan (vc), koloamatangi, samuela fainu
fifita, cartwright
cleary (c) hughes
wighton, iro
garrick, kiraz, marzhew
starling, galvin, d. brown, tedesco
casey mclean, lucas, s. walker, terrell
would you:
TU: no trades or
TU: lucas to yeo although lucas this week vs wests could go large & this is what is stopping me doing that trade maybe do it in the following weeks.
cheers
White Lightning wrote:this is my wife's team ranked at 281 with 4 trades left with 198k bank.
cook
carrigan (vc), koloamatangi, samuela fainu
fifita, cartwright
cleary (c) hughes
wighton, iro
garrick, kiraz, marzhew
starling, galvin, d. brown, tedesco
casey mclean, lucas, s. walker, terrell
would you:
TU: no trades or
TU: lucas to yeo although lucas this week vs wests could go large & this is what is stopping me doing that trade maybe do it in the following weeks.
cheers
BCT05 wrote:Yeah it's far less viable to have a sub 300k shitto/red dot in final teams then it used to be (or even two in the past). A stronger 21 is required because we end up calling on the emg playeds far more often.
The cheapest guy in my team is Hands at $445k. I've had at least one bye player to do looping with every week so that helps but even without that I think you just try pick the right one out of the dirty middies, and unless there is somehow no carnage near the end it will likely pay off.
BCT05 wrote:Yeah it's far less viable to have a sub 300k shitto/red dot in final teams then it used to be (or even two in the past). A stronger 21 is required because we end up calling on the emg playeds far more often.
The cheapest guy in my team is Hands at $445k. I've had at least one bye player to do looping with every week so that helps but even without that I think you just try pick the right one out of the dirty middies, and unless there is somehow no carnage near the end it will likely pay off.
Oz Sport Mad wrote:
Agree with the sentiment but it still depends how your team is going.
Risk and reward stuff.
Just like in an actual game where a team leading by 20 can complete their sets and kick to the corner.
My team on the other hand, now needs to throw it out wide on tackle #1, or start chipping and chasing.....
For that reason, I'm even considering a 2nd sub-300k shitto
I'll either mow down the theoretical 20 point deficit....or I'll get pumped by 50
BCT05 wrote:
Becoming less sure about Sorensen to Ola. It would be an upgrade no doubt but if Sorensen plays 80 again from here on and scores like he had been before this week he averages 48 playing over 70mins. So would definitely be unnecessary if he could manage that the rest of the way.
Not sure what the deal was with the reduced minutes last week though, would hate for it to happen again and get priced out of the move next week.
Itchy trade fingers and limited options playing their part in the thinking too.
Chewie wrote:BCT05 wrote:Yeah it's far less viable to have a sub 300k shitto/red dot in final teams then it used to be (or even two in the past). A stronger 21 is required because we end up calling on the emg playeds far more often.
The cheapest guy in my team is Hands at $445k. I've had at least one bye player to do looping with every week so that helps but even without that I think you just try pick the right one out of the dirty middies, and unless there is somehow no carnage near the end it will likely pay off.
same here, Hands is my cheapest player.
Those with more than 4 trades can probably afford to run with a sub 300k cheapie
Loomer wrote:You don'tYour wife doesn't even have Lucas in 17 so how a trade and I'll be playing him vs Tigers without a second thought
Tigs wrote:most likely just getting rid of a dead spot in Sua this round, thinking Munster in.
robelgordo wrote:^^^ I have no bank otherwise I’d be keen to upgrade one of my many 500k players to Munster if I could do it in one trade
With 3 trades left, don’t think it’s worth getting 2 out to make any moves
Instead will hope I get the loop right and guess correctly which of Fainu and Uto to play
24 hr updated team won't be until 25 mins before tomorrow's last gameKhany wrote:Suspect we won't know about Curran before tonight's game