2016 NRL.com Fantasy thread part 35

What the fuck is with our 1 point losses... ffs... that should have been tied up and should have take the tackle in the middle of the field instead of sending it out to Hunt.... fuck...

20m out, 15 seconds left. Right in front of the posts.

Spread it right with one of your field goal takers.

I thought only Tigers would come up with that

Moses interview was great.

Finch wrote:

Yeah. Lost to the Tigers.

With how many games of experience missing? I would ask what team your support but that might imply that I care.

Tigers dragged Brisbane down to their level and beat them with experience

At least Bunt don't lose points 'cause he couldn't get a point.
Good result I reckon. Broncos will be there at the end of the year and the Tigers needed the encouragement.

DT reporting that Paulo is going to be a late scratching for the eels game. Could be Canberra bound already mayhaps? Hopefully it somehow results in Mau going big (although I can't see how Paulo's minutes would effect him, wishful thinking really).

Is Ben Hunts score enough for loophole?

Broncos lose to Tigers.
Tigers lose to Knights.
Therefore Knights beat Broncos!

Yeah!!!

Sik wrote:Is Ben Hunts score enough for loophole?

If he updates well I'll consider it

Bren wrote:
With how many games of experience missing? I would ask what team your support but that might imply that I care.

Silly excuse really. Its not like the Broncos dont go through this year after year. Bennet showing he cant really coach when his big name players are missing.

Finch wrote:

Silly excuse really. Its not like the Broncos dont go through this year after year. Bennet showing he cant really coach when his big name players are missing.

HS nailed it in his write up, that Broncos side is still probably worth more than the Tigers side even with all the rep players taken out.

Finch wrote:

Silly excuse really. Its not like the Broncos dont go through this year after year. Bennet showing he cant really coach when his big name players are missing.

Silly excuse? Not realĺy, just a fact.

Honeysett wrote:Broncos lose to Tigers.
Tigers lose to Knights.
Therefore Knights beat Broncos!

Yeah!!!

Hang on a sec...

The numbers check out, chalk them up for another win Mr NRL.

I don't mind the games every year where the broncos etc have to field subpar teams, but I do get annoyed when it's the only game they play against a particular opposition throughout the season. If you're not going to have a draw where you play everyone the same number of times, surely the games during the origin period can be against the teams you play twice in the year?

61 for ET right on the border of loopholing with JGrahsm, considering Graham could play more minutes with Klemmer and Jackson out. Probably 60/40 in favour, update to 65+ makes it 100%.

Archer wrote:
HS nailed it in his write up, that Broncos side is still probably worth more than the Tigers side even with all the rep players taken out.

Doesn't matter how much they're worth, if they don't have game experience as a team they're going to struggle. Case in point: NSW

Sik wrote:Is Ben Hunts score enough for loophole?

So who's the other?
I've gone Jraham as vice and Ma'u as cpt.
Now if Jraham scores the same as Bunt is the question for me.

160 from 3 not a bad start might use loop hole for Taylor incase graham gets concussed or injured

rhinoceroo wrote:61 for ET right on the border of loopholing with JGrahsm, considering Graham could play more minutes with Klemmer and Jackson out. Probably 60/40 in favour, update to 65+ makes it 100%.

I would loop. Nice insurance against injury.

Graham is unlikely to bust out a 90, so I don't think you risk losing that much.

I guess odds are good Graham will get 60+ too though if you feel like sticking with him