HomeWhile you are there you can look up how many games of NRL experience the Broncos were missing. Get to it shit brick.Finch wrote:
Yeah NVM, just on Wikipedia and looks like the Broncos always lose around this time of the year.
2016 NRL.com Fantasy thread part 35
Guest- Guest
Finch- Posts : 9577
Reputation : 2801
Join date : 2016-03-02
Bren wrote:
While you are there you can look up how many games of NRL experience the Broncos were missing. Get to it shit brick.
Just because a player has more experience, doesn't mean they are a better player.
Honeysett- Moderator
- Posts : 8949
Reputation : 6471
Join date : 2015-09-28
Bren wrote:
Does that mean the Knights might win this week?
We already won tonight, do I need to show you the math again?
Guest- Guest
Bren wrote:
Does that mean the Knights might win this week?
Well it is 15th vs 16th
Finch- Posts : 9577
Reputation : 2801
Join date : 2016-03-02
Gordon might be going to the Eels. Looks like Mitchell would be a sell if so.
Finch- Posts : 9577
Reputation : 2801
Join date : 2016-03-02
Also Gordon for those that kept him for the byes lol
Archer- Posts : 6604
Reputation : 2306
Join date : 2016-01-12
Location : Who's asking
Bren wrote:
Nice edit. Fact is the Broncos were missing twice as many of their top 17 players as the Tigers regardless of who was left in the squad. 3 x 2 = 6 does it not? Or is maths not your strong point?
Edit: Come on KFP, let us have our fun, it's not every week the 10 million dollar team loses (especially not to a team like the tigers).
Last edited by Archer on Fri May 27, 2016 10:53 pm; edited 1 time in total
Archer- Posts : 6604
Reputation : 2306
Join date : 2016-01-12
Location : Who's asking
Roosters* Yeah I've heard the same. Woooo Guth!Finch wrote:Gordon might be going to the Eels. Looks like Mitchell would be a sell if so.
Archer- Posts : 6604
Reputation : 2306
Join date : 2016-01-12
Location : Who's asking
I double checked it and everything.Honeysett wrote:
We already won tonight, do I need to show you the math again?
Johnny B Goode- Posts : 4077
Reputation : 711
Join date : 2016-01-30
Finch wrote:Gordon might be going to the Eels. Looks like Mitchell would be a sell if so.
Roosters you mean. Heard that, confirms we may be after an experienced guy to ease the pressure on Mitchell and also that Hastings is on the outer because Gordon can kick goals. It must be an off-field issue with Hastings if he's in the shithouse because his on-field efforts were fine.
Finch- Posts : 9577
Reputation : 2801
Join date : 2016-03-02
Archer wrote:
Roosters* Yeah I've heard the same. Woooo Guth!
Oh I meant Kevin Gordon...
(Not really, just trying to save face!)
Guest- Guest
Johnny B Goode wrote:
Roosters you mean. Heard that, confirms we may be after an experienced guy to ease the pressure on Mitchell and also that Hastings is on the outer because Gordon can kick goals. It must be an off-field issue with Hastings if he's in the shithouse because his on-field efforts were fine.
Apparently he's an arrogant dick that no one likes & people think he's weird.
Guest- Guest
I said the Broncos were missing more experience and twice as many players as the Tigers. Fact.Finch wrote:
Just because a player has more experience, doesn't mean they are a better player.
standard-issue- Moderator
- Posts : 19768
Reputation : 10004
Join date : 2015-08-03
Age : 28
Very close call with trades tonight-reversed this morning to think about them and then went to make the same 30 minutes from lockout and internet was playing up. Managed to bring in ET from JDB and Bhunt from Hastings (I swear Bhunt was with 1 second to go).
Now I was trying to work out how to do it without trading either JDB and Hastings but with running out of time had to go the path that I knew would work funds wise.
Long story short, the 3rd trade this week probably needs to be Lamb out. However, I only just traded him out last week for Semi. It is always very difficult to bring a traded player back in, let alone a plodder like Feeney. It truly would be a shit move to bring Feeney back in wouldn't it? I missed a lot of the cheap cash outs with tonights game, and Feeney could conceivably be playing half for the next few months?
Is Feeney ahead of Cogger and Pearsall? They were both rumoured to have niggles?
Now I was trying to work out how to do it without trading either JDB and Hastings but with running out of time had to go the path that I knew would work funds wise.
Long story short, the 3rd trade this week probably needs to be Lamb out. However, I only just traded him out last week for Semi. It is always very difficult to bring a traded player back in, let alone a plodder like Feeney. It truly would be a shit move to bring Feeney back in wouldn't it? I missed a lot of the cheap cash outs with tonights game, and Feeney could conceivably be playing half for the next few months?
Is Feeney ahead of Cogger and Pearsall? They were both rumoured to have niggles?
Guest- Guest
Is this Gordon thing before the 30 June deadline.
Finch- Posts : 9577
Reputation : 2801
Join date : 2016-03-02
Dont trade in Feeney. LOL
standard-issue- Moderator
- Posts : 19768
Reputation : 10004
Join date : 2015-08-03
Age : 28
Finch wrote:Archer wrote:
Roosters* Yeah I've heard the same. Woooo Guth!
Oh I meant Kevin Gordon...
(Not really, just trying to save face!)
Finch- Posts : 9577
Reputation : 2801
Join date : 2016-03-02
White Lightning wrote:Is this Gordon thing before the 30 June deadline.
"Next week"
Guest- Guest
Even the betting odds are laughing at the Knights. $IOOIHoneysett wrote:
We already won tonight, do I need to show you the math again?
standard-issue- Moderator
- Posts : 19768
Reputation : 10004
Join date : 2015-08-03
Age : 28
Finch wrote:Dont trade in Feeney. LOL
If he is starting half on merit (aside from the Lamb injury) then he is a tempting cash out. Were all his shit cunt scores at FB this year, or did he start at half 1 game? If he started at half for the crap he served up then that will seal the deal NOT to be tempted.