2016 NRL.com Fantasy thread part 35

Mighty Fishes wrote:Numbers don't always work. I remember the knights doing poorly when the had Craig Gower, Gidley, Mullen, Snowden and Buderus in the one team surely that's a fair few thousand xp there for an ordinary side

Should have put their XP into better skills when they levelled up.

Bren wrote:NRL games worth of experience missing from their squads last night:

Tigers - 415
Broncos - 1,151

NRL games worth of experience in their squad that took the field last night:

Tigers - 1,402
Broncos - 1,249


I love numbers

My favourite number is 19.

So much better than 18, don't you think

Milchcow wrote:

My favourite number is 19.

So much better than 18, don't you think

I like my women how I like my alcohol. Aged 18 years.

Mighty Fishes wrote:

Numbers don't always work. I remember the knights doing poorly when the had Craig Gower, Gidley, Mullen, Snowden and Buderus in the one team surely that's a fair few thousand xp there for an ordinary side

I agree. Bren thinks that if somebody has played 1000 games they are better than somebody who has played 1. That's the case sometimes. Not all the time though.

Why was 5 afraid of 6?

Because 7 8 9

#PrimarySchoolJoke

Finch wrote:

I agree. Bren thinks that if somebody has played 1000 games they are better than somebody who has played 1. That's the case sometimes. Not all the time though.

Stop twisting my words. I did not say that whatsoever. If that is your opinion then fine but don't go insisting it is mine when I have said nothing of the sort. All I have done is listed the experience missing and playing from last nights game.

Finch wrote:Why was 5 afraid of 6?

Because 7 8 9

#PrimarySchoolJoke

#cantbelieveyoufuckeduptheprimaryschooljoke

Its why is 6 afraid of 7?

Bren wrote:

Stop twisting my words. I did not say that whatsoever. If that is your opinion then fine but don't go insisting it is mine when I have said nothing of the sort. All I have done is listed the experience missing and playing from last nights game.

So what's your point about experience being missed then? Lol

OnTheLast wrote:

#cantbelieveyoufuckeduptheprimaryschooljoke

Its why is 6 afraid of 7?

Uhhh yeah of course it is, I made a typo....

Finch wrote:

So what's your point about experience being missed then? Lol

Show me where I said I thought a player with 1000 games NRL experience is better then 1? Go on, do it now. Show me.

I said the Broncos were missing more players with more experience then the Tigers which they were.

What is your point in any of this anyway? Do you even support the Broncos or Tigers?

m0nty (FanLeague) wrote:

Mighty Fishes wrote:Numbers don't always work. I remember the knights doing poorly when the had Craig Gower, Gidley, Mullen, Snowden and Buderus in the one team surely that's a fair few thousand xp there for an ordinary side

Should have put their XP into better skills when they levelled up.

Gutted for those who kept McCulloch or just brought him in/back in.

What's the difference between a rival and a "shock rival" ?

Like SHOCK He goes to Souths or SHOCK he goes to Brisbane... fuck I hate sportingnews. Can't even get a fucking headline right.

Maybe he's going to a shock a rival by playing for them, like no one in the team will know and he'll just run out in a Storm jersey on the night and Bromwich'll be like 'wtf bro get off the field'.

filthridden wrote:What's the difference between a rival and a "shock rival" ?

Like SHOCK He goes to Souths or SHOCK he goes to Brisbane... fuck I hate sportingnews. Can't even get a fucking headline right.

Maybe he's going to a shock a rival by playing for them, like no one in the team will know and he'll just run out in a Storm jersey on the night and Bromwich'll be like 'wtf bro get off the field'.

Bren wrote:NRL games worth of experience missing from their squads last night:

Tigers - 415
Broncos - 1,151

NRL games worth of experience in their squad that took the field last night:

Tigers - 1,402
Broncos - 1,249


I love numbers

I too like numbers. How much test match experience did tigers have?

Archer wrote:
I too like numbers. How much test match experience did tigers have?

You for real? I can find out if you want but it doesnt reallly interest me. Answer me this, do you still count Jack Reed and Chris Lawrence as internationals?

The turtle I saw down the beach the other day was faster then Jack Reed.

Bren wrote:
You for real? I can find out if you want but it doesnt reallly interest me. Answer me this, do you still count Jack Reed and Chris Lawrence as internationals?

No. You can subtract their games from each tally If you like and yeah I'm curious, the article with kahu talked about the broncos numbers but made no mention of the tigers.

B/L wrote:The turtle I saw down the beach the other day was faster then Jack Reed.

must have seen you coming his way

B/L wrote:The turtle I saw down the beach the other day was faster then Jack Reed.

It had probably been in international waters more recently then Jack Reed has also.