Archer wrote:
Are you saying it might not just be about the number of regular fgers you name?
did you watch the cowboys game?
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
Archer wrote:
Are you saying it might not just be about the number of regular fgers you name?
Archer wrote:Yes.... And?
Archer wrote:Nobody suggested the cowboys wouldn't do well, on the other hand the raiders were "pathetic", "easily the worst" and "wouldn't win a game" all seemingly because they didn't name a lot of regular fgers.
filthridden wrote:Warriors not playing as a team on attack at all. All playing like a bunch of gloryhunters.
Beast From The Big East wrote:
They look like they just expected to throw Johnson into the team, put a few mobile forwards who haven't actually learnt to make some decent metres and want to offload every chance, along with a bunch of quick backs who just want to run down the sideline rather than take a hit and do some gruntwork and they would coast through. Johnson goes down and they lack any sort of direction, noone wants to take ownership of the team and no one want to just do some basics and make a few metres. They all seem to think that every tackle is the last
filthridden wrote:
Yep, no direction at all. Tui is the only one who really looks like he wants to create and his options of running at the line and jinking away and around is very predictable.
Shanbon wrote:i expected nothing less from a Kearney coached team.
The warriors will be interesting to follow this year as Kearney will be all about D with a basic up the middle attack that will rely on 4th and 5th play spreads through SJ and Foran doing something special. How long some of the Warriors can play that style will determine how successful they are