Sik wrote:Who offers better value for money. Kenny Bromwich or Bunty Afoa?
Assuming Kromwich gets named starting and Afoa does too the former doesn't have Hoffman and BT due back within 1-2 rounds to compete with
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
Sik wrote:Who offers better value for money. Kenny Bromwich or Bunty Afoa?
Milchcow wrote:
If interviewed, pretty much every player will say they want to play 80 minutes.
Its the equivalent of training the house down. By itself its just a meaningless statement.
Boozecluez wrote:haha love the Kromwich, just sounds like a great name
Feline wrote:
http://www.nrl.com/how-your-team-could-line-up-in-round-1/tabid/10874/newsid/102827/default.aspx
What does everyone think of these predictions?
Kind of contrary to a range of the views shared here on starting line ups.
Is there anything that is really not correct?
mulvy wrote:
There's this too
http://www.foxsports.com.au/nrl/nrl-premiership/nrl-predicted-round-1-teams-2017-plus-injury-reports-on-each-club/news-story/18118feb8af2c465469c2770ef9fa2b2
Feline wrote:
http://www.nrl.com/how-your-team-could-line-up-in-round-1/tabid/10874/newsid/102827/default.aspx
What does everyone think of these predictions?
Kind of contrary to a range of the views shared here on starting line ups.
Is there anything that is really not correct?
Feline wrote:
http://www.nrl.com/how-your-team-could-line-up-in-round-1/tabid/10874/newsid/102827/default.aspx
What does everyone think of these predictions?
Kind of contrary to a range of the views shared here on starting line ups.
Is there anything that is really not correct?
mulvy wrote:I'm just trying to vet McInnes thoroughly because I'm putting serious consideration into running with McInnes and Brailey.
Johnny B Goode wrote:It might have been mentioned here already but Peats is confirmed out for 6-8 weeks. I suppose Tyrone goes straight there but the guy was never meant to be a starting Hooker. Open up some value for Karl Lawton if he plays?
Johnny B Goode wrote:It might have been mentioned here already but Peats is confirmed out for 6-8 weeks. I suppose Tyrone goes straight there but the guy was never meant to be a starting Hooker. Open up some value for Karl Lawton if he plays?
Johnny B Goode wrote:I just briefly took Smith out to see what my team would look like with a McInnes/Brailey combo. I can get Bryce Cartwright in my HLF's, replace Sironen with a 300k+ 40 point FRF and still run with two top range 2RF guns. It just doesn't feel right though.
I tell you what crazy plan I'm thinking of anyway. When the bye rounds come around and Smith misses a lot of footy I might be stupid enough to replace him for a few weeks with Damien Cook or maybe upgrade Brailey to him. Why? Well Daley loves Farah and will more than likely pick him for NSW so Cook if fit at the time would play the 80 minutes in all the bye rounds.
mulvy wrote:
Because you don't like McInnes? or because Smith is, well Smith?
Loomer wrote:
He's averaged 57 51 59 minutes last 3 seasons. Won't he play similar minutes and score similar. He gets bulk of points from tackles and run metres. Is this going to change?