2017 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 10

Finch wrote:https://twitter.com/ChrisGarry7/status/836827551762886656

Nugget of gold ^

Edit: For the record, I was going to share it anyway

Random wrote:

Where would that leave Croft in all of this?

Welshy wrote:

The 4 games was reference to TMM, Teddy can do what he wants and if that's claiming TB's as base stats then so be it

Mearcats wrote:Well I haven't posted a team up once yet but I think I will just to see what you lot all think. TBF, I'm probably not going to change anything in it as I'm well happy with it but always interesting seeing feedback in case you miss something glaringly outta place. N.B. This side does have Brailey 

Smith Brailey
Fifita DSaifiti FKauf IPapa
Gallen ET KBrom Siro Yates Frankenstein
SJ TMM Elgey Fog
SMat Idris Talaki Kelly
Teddy RTS Hayne Cotric PThing

28k in hand.

The only two things I may change are dumping FStein and moving SMat to the 2RF if Suli gets named which would free me up a bit more cash money

Thinks?

Random wrote:

Where would that leave Croft in all of this?

Also Ryley Jacks isn't named in the 21 so surely he won't be there this week.

pm888 wrote:the same thing happened with munster last year, the storm are dickheads when it comes to sharing information about fullback injuries.

Mearcats wrote:Well I haven't posted a team up once yet but I think I will just to see what you lot all think. TBF, I'm probably not going to change anything in it as I'm well happy with it but always interesting seeing feedback in case you miss something glaringly outta place. N.B. This side does have Brailey 

Smith Brailey
Fifita DSaifiti FKauf IPapa
Gallen ET KBrom Siro Yates Frankenstein
SJ TMM Elgey Fog
SMat Idris Talaki Kelly
Teddy RTS Hayne Cotric PThing

28k in hand.

The only two things I may change are dumping FStein and moving SMat to the 2RF if Suli gets named which would free me up a bit more cash money

Thinks?

Random wrote:

Where would that leave Croft in all of this?

Also Ryley Jacks isn't named in the 21 so surely he won't be there this week.

Finch wrote:If this turns out to be true, you can all thank me later.

No but seriously, it just shows that if you are named #1, #6, #18, #21 on TLT, it doesn't matter.

Random wrote:

Where would that leave Croft in all of this?

Also Ryley Jacks isn't named in the 21 so surely he won't be there this week.

Shanbon wrote:

Yeah it wont happen. No way they can can medical clearance to bring an outside player in just to do a positional swap. I would even think that if there was a medical reason one of the 17 was dropping out the NRL would say you have a half named inside the 21 so why should we let you bring a different one from outside the 21.

Id say at some stage if teams are messing around with players named in 17, but unlikely to play, then get changed out the NRL will make a change and say if the player is unlikely on Tuesday they should be named 18-21

Random wrote:

HOK: But what if... Hear me out now... Sege comes? Naww pretty stock standard pair as far as things go.

FRF: No issues here.

2RF: Looks sweet.

HLF: Running with a poor mans Milford and a bloke who we aren't sure when he will get a run. I think I would look at other options, but there isn't any great options.

CTR: Going good.

WFB: Pretty standard again.

Besides TMM who will heavily rely on attacking stats which could be worrysome as he may lack consistency. Which is a bad thing. The rest of the team is sweet. I personally wouldn't run TMM but he could make you some cash if he lights it up for a string of games.

Finch wrote:

What happened? Refresh my memory?