Finch wrote:I get the feeling Yates + Stone are both traps...
Who is the one with better prospects?
Yates has better NYC stats and has played a year of NSW cup. Plays in the middle, Stone on the edge.
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
Finch wrote:I get the feeling Yates + Stone are both traps...
Who is the one with better prospects?
Johnny B Goode wrote:
Pearce's KM could be affected next to Keary. Connor Watson was in great form but he kicked the ball only a bit more than what TMM did. He's in Gun HLF territory but overpriced for now. Fergo's not a great defender, misses a lot of tackles. Form was really good but not enough to see any big improvement. Cordner's a nice POD, makes prop like metres every week but better players above his price, more value for cash players below him.
I personally think Guerra and Aubo are the best value players for the Chooks. They call him the Black Widow but I tell you with Matterson on the bench Aubo is staying parked in the 2RF
Welshy wrote:
Here she is.
Let's not bother with this fantasy help lark and get straight into L2 sledging?
Random wrote:I really don't like how the update turned out...
Pookus McFly wrote:Uhg, I did the Lamb trade and it makes my team look so much better.
That's the most disgusting part
HOK: Smith / McInnes(r)
FRF: McGuire / Wallace/ Musgrove(r) / Yates
2RF: JDB / ET / Kromwich / Sironen(r) / Faufusi(r) / Fualolo
HLF: DCE / Lamb / Field / Hampton
CTR: Mata'utia / Idris / Lawton / Kelly
WFB: Gutherson / RTS / Hayne / Pythian / Cortic
Mighty Fishes wrote:
L2 sledging hey?
My ranking will be larger than the two of yours put together...
Wait...
Welshy wrote:
100% agree on Panthers
way i see it fella....
TMM 20 tackles 50 RM base (25) - needs 10-15 points a game attacking to get to 35-40
Lamb 20 tackles 50 RM 250-300 KM base (35-40) already at TMM without attacking input
Just think its easier for Lamb to get fantasy points than TMM who also has a shed load of cracking attacking plaers to share attacking duties with.
I'm a base stat whore!
Welshy wrote:
reason for hampton mate?
Mearcats wrote:
Absolutely no way Lamb kicks 250-300 a week with a fit and firing Hodko next to him. And I'm struggling to see the Knights as an attacking team this year (again) so unlike the Panthers where there'll be opportunities a plenty for their attacking players, Lamb will struggle (although may be the only bit of attacking flair they have so may potentially do something more than nothing).
I'm not arguing that Lamb is def the safer bet but I'd be prepared for an avatar bet that TMM outpoints him for the year.
Welshy wrote:
reason for hampton mate?
Welshy wrote:
Why not? If the Knights will be as bad as the were last year there will be more than 600KM a game to go around and Hodko and never been a massive KM eater.
I'l take that bet as long as it doesn't affect all my other avatar bets
Milchcow wrote:
Hampton is the biggest no that ever no'd this year.
As a bench hooker he is overpriced, and is likely to lose you money. Averages 14.3 from the bench, priced at 16.2
Mearcats wrote:
Absolutely no way Lamb kicks 250-300 a week with a fit and firing Hodko next to him. And I'm struggling to see the Knights as an attacking team this year (again) so unlike the Panthers where there'll be opportunities a plenty for their attacking players, Lamb will struggle (although may be the only bit of attacking flair they have so may potentially do something more than nothing).
I'm not arguing that Lamb is def the safer bet but I'd be prepared for an avatar bet that TMM outpoints him for the year.