2017 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 30

all the people jumping on Crichton this week. Have you looked at the other forwards minutes for Souths ?

Gurgess - 18
Turgess - 28
Clark - 30
Musgrove - 30

If all 4 get 40 minutes this week that is 54 minutes to come from somewhere. Assuming Surgess and Sutton keep their minutes, the 54 minutes have to come from Turner (50 minutes) and Crichton (80 minutes)

Just some food for thought !!

filthridden wrote:I've realised Frawley IS named inside the 19.

Bulldogs have not named an 18 or a 22.

Of the 21 named on TLT - 4 have (including Tualau) been named to play in the ISP Cup on Saturday.

1. Josh Bergamin, 2. Tom Carr, 3. Jerry Leasi, 4. Tyrone Phillips, 5. Reimis Smith, 6. Josh Cleeland, 7.Craig Garvey, 8. Andy Saunders, 9. Zac Woolford, 10. Francis Tualau, 11. Asipeli Fine, 12. Rhyse Martin, 13. Renouf To’Omaga,, 14. Bronson Garlick, 15. Ray Moujalli, 16. Darcy Maroske, 17. Rod Griffin.

http://www.bulldogs.com.au/news/2017/04/11/round_7_isp_and_nyc_.html

Suggests Frawley is definitely in the 17. I guess we'll have to wait to see if he starts..

quicksand wrote:all the people jumping on Crichton this week. Have you looked at the other forwards minutes for Souths ?

Gurgess - 18
Turgess - 28
Clark - 30
Musgrove - 30

If all 4 get 40 minutes this week that is 54 minutes to come from somewhere. Assuming Surgess and Sutton keep their minutes, the 54 minutes have to come from Turner (50 minutes) and Crichton (80 minutes)

Just some food for thought !!

What does the front row rotation have to do with the back rowers?

Chris McQueen to the Tigers next year, according to Fox sports.

quicksand wrote:all the people jumping on Crichton this week. Have you looked at the other forwards minutes for Souths ?

Gurgess - 18
Turgess - 28
Clark - 30
Musgrove - 30

If all 4 get 40 minutes this week that is 54 minutes to come from somewhere. Assuming Surgess and Sutton keep their minutes, the 54 minutes have to come from Turner (50 minutes) and Crichton (80 minutes)

Just some food for thought !!

That's a fair point.

Average mins before last week (difference last week in brackets)

Gurgess - 30 (-12)
Turgess - 39 (-11)
Clark - 43 (-13)
Musgrove - 45 (-15)

Turner - 60 (-10)
Crichton - 51 (+29)

Has anything changed structurally? Hmmm I was all set to bring him in this week too!

Rabbit wrote:

Fuck it pisses me off how left wing you are. Stick to fantasy. Not everyone is a bleeding heart and not everyone agrees with your soft cock politics. SBW can follow the same rules as everyone else. He, nor his religion, deserve special treatment.

I've been at the Easter show all day and reading this quite late.

But would you like us to find you a safe space, my little snowflake? Somewhere you can hang out without having to get upset about other people's opinions.

awanamafia wrote:

According to Milch's stats - he played the first 11 games on the Wing last season for an average of 32.

No games at Fullback according to the spreadsheet..

One of those games Gordon got injured and Guth moved to fullback. That was the game he scored 80+ in.

Chewie wrote:Gutherson at Fullback

The link above is the nrl.com write up after the game Gutherson played at fullback

Hard choice for last reserve this week
CHN on the bench
Jacks with Munster lurking
Hampton in an unfamiliar role
Next week I'll have a gun to step in to the 17 but in the mean time it's difficult to pick and I'm sure I will pick wrong

Walker or tedesco? Can't go wrong with either. Leaning towards walker for the byes, but feel teddy will score better anyway.

pm888 wrote:Walker or tedesco? Can't go wrong with either. Leaning towards walker for the byes, but feel teddy will score better anyway.

Tedesco should play origin.
Walker probably won't.

Chucky wrote:
Tedesco should play origin.
Walker probably won't.

edited mate

Whilst I'm not knocking on what is already an awesome product, and I have no ability to follow thru with this suggestion, but the start of the week is always full of posts like: I'm leaning towards bringing XX in and trading YY out, or AA in for BB. Often these go without response due to lengthy explanations needed.

For those web gurus out there, Is there a way we can replicate the thumbs up/down vote on each post  for an a) or b) vote and not link it to the reputation? Of course people asking would have to offer two solutions to get advice on, but this could also reinforce the "go with your gut" theory.

This could offer people heaps more feedback on proposed solutions without the need for detailed replies. The more experienced and educated could continue to post detailed responses, but allow for short, snappy surveying of collective thoughts.

Anyways, just a thought and not sure if its viable technologically.

I'll close this by reinforcing the initial point - awesome site, good people, good conversation. For a newbie at this fantasy stuff (second year syndrome) - its a wealth of info.

BroncHose wrote:Whilst I'm not knocking on what is already an awesome product, and I have no ability to follow thru with this suggestion, but the start of the week is always full of posts like: I'm leaning towards bringing XX in and trading YY out, or AA in for BB. Often these go without response due to lengthy explanations needed.

For those web gurus out there, Is there a way we can replicate the thumbs up/down vote on each post  for an a) or b) vote and not link it to the reputation? Of course people asking would have to offer two solutions to get advice on, but this could also reinforce the "go with your gut" theory.

This could offer people heaps more feedback on proposed solutions without the need for detailed replies. The more experienced and educated could continue to post detailed responses, but allow for short, snappy surveying of collective thoughts.

Anyways, just a thought and not sure if its viable technologically.

I'll close this by reinforcing the initial point - awesome site, good people, good conversation. For a newbie at this fantasy stuff (second year syndrome) - its a wealth of info.

I wouldn't go with XX if I were you, but trading in AA is a good move

pm888 wrote:Walker or tedesco? Can't go wrong with either. Leaning towards walker for the byes, but feel teddy will score better anyway.

It's also tricky bringing in too many Souths players for round 12 because they have a bye in round 13. I probably go Walker for the byes but as you say Tedesco is a beast & the team will be full on confidence.

Tedesco only misses 1 extra game, I'd back him to score more than Walker from now until R19

But Walker offers cover in the tough bye rounds where good points can skyrocket your ranking

Chewie wrote:
I wouldn't go with XX if I were you, but trading in AA is a good move

but XX has been training the house down!

talked myself into adding Tedesco i think haha

Lamb - Hampton
Suli - Tedesco via Cotric

Welshy wrote:Tedesco only misses 1 extra game, I'd back him to score more than Walker from now until R19

But Walker offers cover in the tough bye rounds where good points can skyrocket your ranking

I'm turning Lamb into Walker this week.

wolfking wrote:

Im losing faith in lamb, but its nice to read people still value him. I will still probably hold him for now but will play jacks over him if munster drops out.

You could hold him for a week no probs. But his break even is 40, we thought he would get 40 but he's averaging 35, either way he's not making money. If he's not in your 17 he's not getting you points either. Isn't that the definition of a stinky midranger? He's a trade for mine, urgency up to you