2018 NRL.com Fantasy thread part 4

my tv broke wrote:Alright im gonna sound like a prick right now but is it really necessary to sign up and with your first post, ask people to rate your team, which is comprised of 98% of players whove all been talked about all preseason already? Not saying my team is any different.

Add something to the discussion

White Lightning wrote:

Every year since I started playing fantasy I've always wanted Kasiano in my team but never did because of his minutes. The Storm factor makes him appealing. I think he was lazy at the Bulldogs because he knew he'd play shit minutes so he wasn't motivated. With NAS getting minutes on the edge then maybe Kasiano is in for more minutes than he was playing at the Doggies. I see he was averaging 30 minutes so maybe now it could rise to 40.

multiple.scoregasms wrote:Gone cold on Latu after digging through some stats. Averaged 36 minutes and don't see him getting much higher. 6/19 games with 20+ tackles and only 2 games with more than 100 metres.

Welshy wrote:

I share these sentiments MS. Being a starter might push him to 40/45 and a new club and new role might spur him on a bit and he has averaged decently in the past but will probably give him a miss

Blakejr1 wrote:What is everyones opinion on Twal?

I had him as someone who i believe will be a handy mid ranger but what does everyone else believe?

Milchcow wrote:

I don't often comment on rate my team posts for this reason. But the best way to think of the posts is to just concentrate on the PODs mentioned.

Eg recent RMT had all the standards with Cordner and Slater. That is worthy of discussion (even if I didn't personally contribute, I took an interest in it)

Blakejr1 wrote:What is everyones opinion on Twal?

I had him as someone who i believe will be a handy mid ranger but what does everyone else believe?

Welshy wrote:Tad harsh I think on that sort of response, not everyone reads through the shed load of pages to see who has picked what and the vast majority will be the same players because there are so many great fantasy players and people on this forum

Whenever someone picks someone out of the blue anyway they usually get told to swap with player X that 99% of teams have anyway

Blakejr1 wrote:What is everyones opinion on Twal?

I had him as someone who i believe will be a handy mid ranger but what does everyone else believe?

multiple.scoregasms wrote:

Going to be a gun real life player but don't think he has much fantasy value. Pretty much 1 PPM for an average of 40 minutes. Woods gone but replaced with Packer and Matulino. Don't see the upside

White Lightning wrote:Further on Twal. I think Twal & Eisenhuth will be used as interchange props & I can see Eisenhuth getting more minutes than Twal. I think the minutes will be:
Matulino 45, Packer 40, Eisenhuth 40, Twal 35

Blakejr1 wrote:


Thats a shame though, would have been a very good mid range cash cow

Welshy wrote:

Could be good for later in the season with Twal dropping some value then being thrust into a larger role if any injuries occur or Cleary mixes it up

Blakejr1 wrote:

Thats very true, have to keep him on the watch list.

Whare? good third winger to have? or go with someone like a isaako?

Fortitude wrote:Was running Twal and Smith in initial drafts.

Now running Friend and Tapau.

Will probably change again.

Blakejr1 wrote:Who really is a good third winger to run, im not looking to spend too much when there are other areas i would rather have more cash invested in