Could be our 4th reggies hooker while still playing ET at 9.filthridden wrote:
Are you talking to Rapture or the Tigers board?
2018 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 54
Krump- Posts : 8454
Reputation : 4770
Join date : 2015-07-31
Location : Your mums room
- Post n°341
Re: 2018 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 54
Loomer- Fanatic
- Posts : 10738
Reputation : 4331
Join date : 2016-01-29
- Post n°342
Re: 2018 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 54
Blain wrote:
This, I have been waiting for this day to come.. Ha! He's looked good this year, I can't understand why he's on the bench. I guess he offers spark, but not sure why he isn't there instead of Olive. Hoppa could be an option I guess. Holland could even play Fullback.
Farah to the Tigers is LOL, makes sense on paper but little else. Would 100% buy though
Anything that doesn't make sense about the Dogs = Dean Pay
StormTrooper96- Posts : 9974
Reputation : 3353
Join date : 2018-02-26
Age : 28
- Post n°343
Re: 2018 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 54
Source says that Cowboys have offered Val Holmes a big money contract that Sharks may not be able to match
standard-issue- Moderator
- Posts : 19768
Reputation : 10004
Join date : 2015-08-03
Age : 28
- Post n°344
Re: 2018 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 54
Krump wrote:Did my best @SI impression and it looks like they're both from Newcastle so fair chance.Fortitude wrote:What are the chances that Shakes Crushers (2nd) and Petes Punishers (4th) are the same people. Fairly unusual last name. Bloody good effort to have two teams in top 5 if its.
I also would love to think its two brothers or father son that are battling it out.
Impressive young Padwan
Pete's Punishers has been around for about a decade I reckon. Was right up in the rankings a couple of years in the old DT.
I also wonder if Shakes Crushers is Shakes Crusaders from the old DT days? That team was almost always ranked very high as well.
No Worries- Moderator
- NRL FF Survivor Champion : I'm like the waterboy.
Posts : 10527
Reputation : 7276
Join date : 2015-07-31
- Post n°345
Re: 2018 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 54
StormTrooper96 wrote:Source says that Cowboys have offered Val Holmes a big money contract that Sharks may not be able to match
Or are they pushing the Sharks to stretch so they can't afford the forward that the Cowboys are actually after.
Nothing happens in isolation
Guest- Guest
- Post n°346
Re: 2018 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 54
Krump wrote:
100% against the rules, your wife needs to run another team
I suppose you poolhop as well?
I'm just being facetious. I'm running only one team and really cant be bothered to do anything more than that
BUT, I'm not seeing in the rules where it says you cant run more than one team. Shrug
Edit, I've just emailed the 'contact us' to check if I can run 100 teams next season. Might troll them a bit with some email ping pong
Last edited by Verbal Kint on Fri Jun 15, 2018 12:35 pm; edited 1 time in total
Krump- Posts : 8454
Reputation : 4770
Join date : 2015-07-31
Location : Your mums room
- Post n°347
Re: 2018 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 54
I don't think the Sharks would stretch much if at all for him. Flanno doesn't seem to rate him as much as others.No Worries wrote:
Or are they pushing the Sharks to stretch so they can't afford the forward that the Cowboys are actually after.
Nothing happens in isolation
Krump- Posts : 8454
Reputation : 4770
Join date : 2015-07-31
Location : Your mums room
- Post n°348
Re: 2018 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 54
It might not be there anymore. It's not a rule that ever bothered me but I'd be devasted if I won only to have it taken off me later.Verbal Kint wrote:
I'm just being facetious. I'm running only one team and really cant be bothered to do anything more than that
BUT, I'm not seeing in the rules where it says you cant run more than one team. Shrug
Edit, I've just emailed the 'contact us' to check if I can run 100 teams next season. Might troll them a bit with some email ping pong
Guest- Guest
- Post n°349
Re: 2018 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 54
It would also suck if you came second to someone with 100 teams running
Krump- Posts : 8454
Reputation : 4770
Join date : 2015-07-31
Location : Your mums room
- Post n°350
Re: 2018 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 54
I reckon LB must be running a few teams. It'd at least explain the trades
Guest- Guest
- Post n°351
Re: 2018 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 54
Krump wrote:I reckon LB must be running a few teams. It'd at least explain the trades
Haha, you've got to quench that trade thirst somehow!
No Worries- Moderator
- NRL FF Survivor Champion : I'm like the waterboy.
Posts : 10527
Reputation : 7276
Join date : 2015-07-31
- Post n°352
Re: 2018 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 54
I'm with Flanno. But it's all a game when it omes to the capKrump wrote:
I don't think the Sharks would stretch much if at all for him. Flanno doesn't seem to rate him as much as others.
Loomer- Fanatic
- Posts : 10738
Reputation : 4331
Join date : 2016-01-29
- Post n°353
Re: 2018 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 54
Thinking of taking Murray 28pts instead of Olive or Katoa. Titans not giving up lot of points to CTRs and Broncos not giving away many points to wingers
Liverpool_Bulldog- Fanatic
- Posts : 19477
Reputation : 6801
Join date : 2016-02-14
Location : New Zealand
- Post n°354
Re: 2018 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 54
Haha good bantz lads.
WT Winfield- Posts : 9639
Reputation : 6997
Join date : 2016-08-21
- Post n°355
Re: 2018 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 54
Loomer wrote:Thinking of taking Murray 28pts instead of Olive or Katoa. Titans not giving up lot of points to CTRs and Broncos not giving away many points to wingers
I wouldn't consider it. Anyone can go 50+ on their day and I'd rather risk a 16 from Katoa or Olive than lock in a 28.
wolfking- Fanatics Immortal
- Posts : 34157
Reputation : 14195
Join date : 2016-04-26
Age : 40
Location : Brisbane
- Post n°356
Re: 2018 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 54
Kennar released to go on a mormon mission.
bluetige- Posts : 2235
Reputation : 749
Join date : 2015-12-13
- Post n°357
Re: 2018 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 54
WT Winfield wrote:
I wouldn't consider it. Anyone can go 50+ on their day and I'd rather risk a 16 from Katoa or Olive than lock in a 28.
I'm not saying he should but I banked a 26 last week when I had a chance of poolhoping Olive, so in that instance it worked for me
wolfking- Fanatics Immortal
- Posts : 34157
Reputation : 14195
Join date : 2016-04-26
Age : 40
Location : Brisbane
- Post n°358
Re: 2018 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 54
bluetige wrote:
I'm not saying he should but I banked a 26 last week when I had a chance of poolhoping Olive, so in that instance it worked for me
Id still risk it. Katoa got 24 last week anyway and did nothing, and Olive could do turn up against his old club.
my tv broke- Fanatics Immortal
- Posts : 28424
Reputation : 21079
Join date : 2016-01-08
- Post n°359
Re: 2018 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 54
I have more of an issue with people running multiple teams than poolhopping to be honest.
Fair enough if second team is an experiment in some way eg all cows.
Fair enough if second team is an experiment in some way eg all cows.
Mulvy- Moderator
- Posts : 22374
Reputation : 13731
Join date : 2016-01-26
Location : Mulvania
- Post n°360
Re: 2018 NRL.com Fantasy Thread Part 54
I would also risk it. Chance of a great score vs losing a few points.