2019 NRL.com Fantasy thread part 3

Sipi1994 wrote:Napa looks like he’ll be suspended for the first 7 rounds or so. Tolman May well play 65 minutes or so now, Sue to start and a youngster(?) Onto the bench who won’t soak up the 35 bench minutes Sue would have. Both Tolman and Sue could be value now.

So BS that Napa gets suspended. NRL need to wake up.

Sipi1994 wrote:Napa looks like he’ll be suspended for the first 7 rounds or so. Tolman May well play 65 minutes or so now, Sue to start and a youngster(?) Onto the bench who won’t soak up the 35 bench minutes Sue would have. Both Tolman and Sue could be value now.

Not sure I was that ken on Napa but & weeks is HUGE

Why is Napa being suspended because he’s a victim?

Sipi1994 wrote:Napa looks like he’ll be suspended for the first 7 rounds or so. Tolman May well play 65 minutes or so now, Sue to start and a youngster(?) Onto the bench who won’t soak up the 35 bench minutes Sue would have. Both Tolman and Sue could be value now.

Really can't see how that happens.

SI wrote:

Dat you Matty?

Nah, got better things to do

?

I can't find anything

HKrump wrote:

Really can't see how that happens.

Imagine the uproar if an wnrl player was suspended because she was a victim of revenge porn

Mulvy wrote::sauce: ?

I can't find anything

https://www.smh.com.au/sport/nrl/napa-may-have-been-young-and-stupid-but-that-won-t-save-him-from-ban-20190201-p50v42.html

Mulvy wrote: ?

I can't find anything

The closest thing I could find was the statement from Greenburg a couple of weeks ago saying he could be suspended. A competent lawyer would have a field day with them banning him IMO.

Krump wrote:

Really can't see how that happens.

You can’t see Tolman playing that many minutes with that pack?

I'm no fan of the bulldogs but they've been royally fucked by the NRL on this one

Enchanted Glossy Flamingo wrote:I'm no fan of the bulldogs but they've been royally fucked by the NRL on this one

Agreed.

If Sue starts, do the dogs fill their bench with backrowers, or is there some cheap FRF's that get a shot?

I don’t see anything concrete in that article. Is it just an opinion on Napa’s fate?

Mulvy wrote:If Sue starts, do the dogs fill their bench with backrowers, or is there some cheap FRF's that get a shot?

Surely they’d bring a young frf to the bench. That’s why I feel Sue and Tolman could well be decent value now as I think Sue probably plays 40-45 minutes now and Tolman 65 if they have a young bloke on the bench as opposed to Sue playing 35 and Napa 40-45 if he weren’t suspended.

L-Jimmy wrote:

https://www.smh.com.au/sport/nrl/napa-may-have-been-young-and-stupid-but-that-won-t-save-him-from-ban-20190201-p50v42.html

That journo is an idiot. Goes on to say Greenburg won't have anything derailing the start of his season right after an idiot Greenburg covered up for beats his missus yet again.
Meanwhile we have another actual victim of revenge porn who's a chance of being suspended because another unnamed player felt that they had the right to leak the footage.
I'm all for the game taking a hard stance when warranted but attacking victims isn't the place to do it. Maybe Greenburg should have considered his new hard line stance before writing a character reference for a bloke who was speeding while drunk and putting lives in danger.

Sipi1994 wrote:

You can’t see Tolman playing that many minutes with that pack?

I can't see Big Papi missing a minute of footy for those videos without him and the Dogs suing the pants off the NRL

Krump wrote:

Sipi1994 wrote:

You can’t see Tolman playing that many minutes with that pack?

I can't see Big Papi missing a minute of footy for those videos without him and the Dogs suing the pants off the NRL

I can't see Big Papi missing a minute of footy for those videos without him and the Dogs suing the pants off the NRL

Mighty Fishes wrote:

Imagine the uproar if an wnrl player was suspended because she was a victim of revenge porn

A lady wouldnt have been stupid enough to have filmed it then shown it in a group chat with her team mates.