by CubanMafiaSandSlugs Mon Feb 18, 2019 10:19 pm
Chewie wrote:Not sure about Radley after that game. If he's only going to get 50ish minutes and does the decoy runs he might not be worth it.
Now to find a worthy replacement. I already have Arrow, Murray and Stimson. Maybe Gillet or Whitehead? Any other suggestions?
Just on Radley, not much has changed from end of last year. He will score around 38-40 per game on average from 50 mins. He's a no go IMO. Trent Robinson will always sub his lock and give them a 50/30 min split at largest variance. Alternatively, if Robinson was playing Radley 80 mins on an edge, he'd be a lock down buy and would score 50+ most weeks IMO. In his 2nd row games last season from the start, he averaged around 43 in an average of 62 mins. At that PPM, that would project his score to 55 approx in 80 mins. Gun level. Add another year's experience and power as he builds towards his prime years, and you'd have a lockdown gun. But i just don't see it in a 50 min lock forward role. He doesn't have the Taumalolo or Taupau power. Yet.
Starting lock always seems to get everyone's hopes way up though, usually more than they should be. That is thanks to the days of prime CP13, PG13 & SB13!
Starting locks in general are props these days, since the 8 man interchange was introduced especially. Effectively the same role. 3 starting big men in the middle at 8, 10 & 13 playing between 40 and 55 mins each, with 3 on the bench to sub them out. Two edge back rowers play 80 each, and a hooker/utility as 4th sub. That's the ideal combination.
Of course, there are still a couple of outliers at lock like Trbojevic in particular, and maybe Arrow & Nathan Brown when fully fit and firing, but I think you really need to assess each player on his own merits/minutes/output expected.