NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
No Worries wrote:
Considering the cap is suppose to be for 30 players, but taking into account discounts for long term players etc. You should be able to fill 21 spots. I tried it with the Tigers and was only able to fill 18 positions
Fortitude wrote:I’m told by a, ah friend, that it looks just like her. Super unlucky to have your doppelgänger caught in a compromising position with players from the club your dads a legend at. What are the chances.
But seriously fuck those guys. It’s a dog act. They the real rat bags out of all of this
Fortitude wrote:I’m told by a, ah friend, that it looks just like her. Super unlucky to have your doppelgänger caught in a compromising position with players from the club your dads a legend at. What are the chances.
But seriously fuck those guys. It’s a dog act. They the real rat bags out of all of this
Milchy wrote:
People hate on NRL Memes (and whoever else) for sharing the videos. But if you go onto any Facebook group, every 2nd post is people asking for people to send them the videos. For every person who ignores it, there are 5 who want themselves a copy of the action.
The lengths people will go to amaze me. I tip my hat to you.Milchy wrote:
When Fanhub first took over, and didn't have a match centre, I created 16 teams, 1 for each club to have an 'easy' way to collect stats. At the time every club easily fit their 25 most expensive players inside the salary cap
I can see the hypocrisy but it doesn't stop me wanting to look or stop me thinking NRL memes is a dick for releasing it.Milchy wrote:
People hate on NRL Memes (and whoever else) for sharing the videos. But if you go onto any Facebook group, every 2nd post is people asking for people to send them the videos. For every person who ignores it, there are 5 who want themselves a copy of the action.
Milikache wrote:Tolman < Murray? (minutes dependent)
Edwards > Hughes > Moylan?
Great Avatar btw
I can't find anything. Possibly a deductions error?Revraiser wrote:Hey guys, dont wanna flood this thread with gambling stuff but it has some traffic - has anyone here got a TAB account and today been given 'fixed odds error' adjustments and a tidy sum in there account ? Im curious as to specifically where it was wrong, withdrew the majority !
Murray is a way better pick than Tolman.Milikache wrote:Tolman vs Murray?
Edwards vs Hughes vs Moylan?
L-Jimmy wrote:If Hodkinson starts, then at 237k I’ll think carefully about him in my 21. GK, KM and a decent short kicking game raises his average closer to 30 points
Krump wrote:
I can't find anything. Possibly a deductions error?
Murray is a way better pick than Tolman.
Edwards or Hughes comes down to preference but both ahead of Moylan.
Played 80 7 times for an average of less than 20.MilfordTheMagician wrote:
He started quite a few games at 6 last season alongside Cherry too and scored like shit in most games.
Thanks Mate! Points added in the quote. That should clear up some of the Kahu talk from earlierbluetige wrote:Some minutes from the Cowboys v Storm trial at Mackay on Saturday night
Kahu 80min at fullback 16pts
Morgan 80min at HLF only 19pts
TMM 40 min first half 12 pts
Clifford 40min 2nd half 14 pts
Croft 72min 21 pts
Munster 72min 40 pts
cam smith 50min 29 pts
drinkwater 59min before injuring Pec 16 pts
Any before nominations long range racing bets? Maybe the one you backed didn't nominate hence the refund.Revraiser wrote:
I got the exact same adjustment a couple months ago, but it was for about $75.00, today's is over 1500. Unless i call up (hesitant to do in case it gets taken back). I made a few hefty fixed odd's bets in the past month or so, i guess i'll just shut up and take it hey.
Krump wrote:
Thanks Mate! Points added in the quote. That should clear up some of the Kahu talk from earlier
Home
my tv broke