NRL Fantasy 2019 Part 41

Adrianoooo wrote:

Wouldn’t you then be burned on the second bye round? Unless you plan on ploughing through trades

Johnny B Goode wrote:I can't believe I've done this. I've reversed my McCullough to Mahoney trade.

I just feel like with everyone crapping on him and trading him out, stupid Mole articles saying they were considering Su'A and retaining his Origin spot by default, he might actually fire up and stick it to everyone.  

That or I have another sub-50 score coming my way which is more likely but some part of me thinks I shouldn't let him go yet.  

bluetige wrote:This from Capewell;

"I'm just looking to play a bit better than I did on the weekend," Capewell said.

"I had a bit of a shocker, so I'll look to go back to the drawing board this week, just keep things simple and play good footy no matter where I am on the park."

When it comes to footballers, the guy's a genius realising he had a shocker. Too late to realise now buddy, after you fucked me and many more over already

Milchy wrote:
The maximum total bye players you can have is 33 over the 2 rounds. That's with no origin players and max trading between byes to bring in bye players.

Anyone who managed it would be stuffing their team up so badly for non bye rounds that they would have no chance overall. Would also need to get lucky with injuries, and surprise origin picks.

I'd say if you can get 12 reasonable scorers each bye round you'll be doing OK.

Long term planning often sucks because your key trade in goes and gets injured anyway

MilfordTheMagician wrote:Garner to Rein worth it? Gives me a round 12 player for non round 12 player and Garner is about ready to be traded anyway.

Fortitude wrote:

I think this happened last year? but it was more because non bye playing keepers got injured, and everyone who would of had less players in the bye, all of a sudden had the same as those who ahd carefully bye planned.

I could be wrong. My memory is shiity

Milchy wrote:


Long term planning often sucks because your key trade in goes and gets injured anyway

Fortitude wrote:

If you think Garner is ready to be traded, then that's a solid trade. Maybe a bit late on Rein Early on Garner. But you cant win every scenario.

MilfordTheMagician wrote:

I'm more looking at Rein for his points than price, plus being one of the best looking round 12 bye players at this point. Peats is still out for a while which helps too.

AL wrote:

Smith is only averaging 0.2 more than Cook which I am comfortable calling negligible (unless I came second by a point or 2 at seasons end). It’s also only been the last 2 weeks Smith has closed the gap with back to back 70+ scores and Smith has had a 42 this season, lower than Cook’s current low score.

If you have picked Cook each and every week your Captain is averaging near enough to 62 and that’s got to be a pass mark.

I had Smith all pre season but got spooked by BSmith and also the ‘he’s got to start slowing down at some point’ theory. Have regretted it but would have had him and Cook, not instead of. He will rip the Broncos a new one is my tip, so I’m staying on board even against my team.

Milchy wrote:Long term planning often sucks because your key trade in goes and gets injured anyway

Fortitude wrote:Now ive decided on not trading, need to choose between Morgan, CHT or Sivo.

Assuming the realistic options Would be play Morgan or CHT??

MilfordTheMagician wrote:How many players are people looking to have for round 12?