NRL Fantasy 2021 Part 80 - Everyone gets a banner

toast wrote:

With everyone paying attention to Hughes/DCE/Cleary, I like this as a POD play. Top 5k ownership 0.36%. Not sure if I could pull the trigger myself though.

robelgordo wrote:

Why would he not play 80?

The Pascoe Fiasco wrote:I can’t understand how people are hanging on Cleary’s return. He’s not likely to play next week, and even if he does come back after that you’ll need to give him a couple of weeks to see how he goes (no way plays 80 mins for a while) then he’ll get rested in round 25. Surely DCE or Hughes or AD, or just about anyone outscores him by a mile!

Milchcow wrote:

Munster has scored 3 tries in 3 weeks, which is why he looks tempting.

If he does not maintain his try scoring run, he will be a disappointment (so a true POD, if that is what you are after)

my tv broke wrote:Forum bet that Cleary posts 2 or more banners before end of season ?

Mr Snrub wrote:

When he comes back and scores 92 you'll understand why people are waiting on him. Also of course he'd play 80 if fit. May is injured, who would they interchange in his place? Why play him if he isn't capable of a full game?

DCE could easily be rested in the last round too if Top 4 is out of the equation. Hughes is definitely going to be rested. It's also not like you're not playing anyone in Cleary's absence. I can play a 45-50 average player in the meantime and then Cleary's 160 captain points a week probably makes up for it.  

The Pascoe Fiasco wrote:
His injury? Do you really think Penrith will risk Cleary when there is no need. A Panther’s ex Team Dr commented on a SC site that he sold him as soon as his injury was revealed. He thinks he might not be back this year. Those injuries are very unstable and the long term gain is far more important than the short term. If he plays again, and the Panthers have the game in the bag he’ll be the first player off.

robelgordo wrote:

There is no history of players being eased back from shoulder dislocations. He is either fit and ready to play 80 or he doesn't play. All indications are it will be R21.

In terms of need they will likely lose this week and drop to equal 2nd with Souths, they then play Roosters next week and Souths in R23. They need him.

Agree he might be rested in R25, but they play Eels so maybe noe. And a bunch of other players we all own might be rested too.

michaelz101 wrote:If I was Ivan Cleary why would I risk my son playing when he isn’t 100%? Reinjury can occur and there is absolutely no need to risk him for the next few weeks. There is no home ground advantage this year and I’ll just save him till the finals run.

michaelz101 wrote:If I was Ivan Cleary why would I risk my son playing when he isn’t 100%? Reinjury can occur and there is absolutely no need to risk him for the next few weeks. There is no home ground advantage this year and I’ll just save him till the finals run.

The Pascoe Fiasco wrote:
His injury? Do you really think Penrith will risk Cleary when there is no need. A Panther’s ex Team Dr commented on a SC site that he sold him as soon as his injury was revealed. He thinks he might not be back this year. Those injuries are very unstable and the long term gain is far more important than the short term. If he plays again, and the Panthers have the game in the bag he’ll be the first player off.

robelgordo wrote:

Wait who is to say he's not 100% when he returns? Mahoney came back last week, same duration as Cleary playing next week, same injury - looked fine.

Does not playing longer reduce the risk of reinjury, somehow? Does increase the risk of Panthers entering the finals with more Ls, less confidence, less aura, cold combinations etc.

The Pascoe Fiasco wrote:
Do they have the same degree of injury? Who knows? I’m happy to take the good doctor’s opinion over most people here. Parra also has no other option at No 9!

The Pascoe Fiasco wrote:Why do you think Rd 21? Surely Rd 22 would be far more sensible taking their opposition into account, even then, they’ll win that game without him. This whole discussion is pretty pointless until he actually gets named an hour before kick off whichever round it is. Any player could be rested pre semis so I’d go Doueihi over all of those players as there is zero chance he gets rested and has a great draw. I don’t see DCE getting rested before Rd 25.

The Pascoe Fiasco wrote:Why do you think Rd 21? Surely Rd 22 would be far more sensible taking their opposition into account, even then, they’ll win that game without him. This whole discussion is pretty pointless until he actually gets named an hour before kick off whichever round it is. Any player could be rested pre semis so I’d go Doueihi over all of those players as there is zero chance he gets rested and has a great draw. I don’t see DCE getting rested before Rd 25.

Milchcow wrote:Cleary is averaging more than 20 points a game more than the next best player.

Factor in captaincy points, and if he returns anywhere close to how he's played most of the season, and he is essential.

if Cleary plays 4+ games over the rest of the year, I'm confident you won't be able to win the comp without him