rhinoceroo wrote:
Load up on SJ!
*(I'm joking, but now I'm actually thinking about it, gah)
Shaun Johnson is going to be one of those picks that seem obvious in hindsight that no-one makes
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
rhinoceroo wrote:
Load up on SJ!
*(I'm joking, but now I'm actually thinking about it, gah)
multiple.scoregasms wrote:
I think on squad balance I'm going to only have one of Aitken and Burton for round 1. Leaning towards Burton because I think he has more chance to burn me if I'm wrong
I see Burton with a floor of 40 average and a ceiling of 65 average while Aitken is probably closer to 35 floor 55 ceiling. Due to 4 tries in 5 games it's hard to project Aitken's score moving forward. I'm kind of projecting his ceiling based on a similar player in Frizell. Both are good hole runners, solid defenders, not huge metre eaters and play for fringe top 8 teams. Of course if Aitken continues to score 4 tries every 5 games that projection will look pretty silly, but I don't think he will massively out perform his price
multiple.scoregasms wrote:
I think on squad balance I'm going to only have one of Aitken and Burton for round 1. Leaning towards Burton because I think he has more chance to burn me if I'm wrong
I see Burton with a floor of 40 average and a ceiling of 65 average while Aitken is probably closer to 35 floor 55 ceiling. Due to 4 tries in 5 games it's hard to project Aitken's score moving forward. I'm kind of projecting his ceiling based on a similar player in Frizell. Both are good hole runners, solid defenders, not huge metre eaters and play for fringe top 8 teams. Of course if Aitken continues to score 4 tries every 5 games that projection will look pretty silly, but I don't think he will massively out perform his price
The Dolphin Conspiracies wrote:
Shaun Johnson is going to be one of those picks that seem obvious in hindsight that no-one makes
The Dolphin Conspiracies wrote:In the R16 game against the Eels, where he scored 19, he actually played at CTR with May in the halves.
The Dolphin Conspiracies wrote:
Shaun Johnson is going to be one of those picks that seem obvious in hindsight that no-one makes
Milchcow wrote:
80 points rd1
12 points and injury rd2
I reckon he is atleast 10 points underpriced if he stays fitThe Dolphin Conspiracies wrote:
Shaun Johnson is going to be one of those picks that seem obvious in hindsight that no-one makes
The Dolphin Conspiracies wrote:
They call him the
- Milchcow:
At the start of the pre-season, I could not think of a worse pick than Xavier Coates. But now I am scraping the bottom of the barrel for bench cover at WFB, he keeps poking his head up. Moving to the Storm was worth about a 10 point average jump for Gennings. Can we expect the same for Coates MC Bubble Burster?
The Dolphin Conspiracies wrote:
Shaun Johnson is going to be one of those picks that seem obvious in hindsight that no-one makes
multiple.scoregasms wrote:
Before kick metres got nerfed he was a lock for my team
Rabbits21 wrote:I’m warming to starting with Christian Welch after studying his stats. I might be aboard the Welch train Beth. I think I trust his role and mins more than Uto. Storm have lost Finucane, NAS and Tui as well in the poo I really think Welch could get 55mins and look at his offload ability.
Milchcow wrote:
80 points rd1
12 points and injury rd2
Regulator wrote:
His miss tackles just get frustrating AF as an owner.
They aren't even bad miss tackles, you'll see him make two tackles in a row and be like good man Welch, then he'll throw an arm out trying to make three in a row that he's never going to reach and undoes the points.
multiple.scoregasms wrote:
Before kick metres got nerfed he was a lock for my team
mattnz wrote:
His price was reduced accordingly. Unless you expect a significant increase in kick meters from last season, it shouldn't make a difference
Mulvy wrote:
Think I'm with MS on this one. Yes his price has been reduced accordingly and yes he is undervalued, but if a gun is undervalued by a few points that's a good pick. But the nerf means he might not even break 50 which begs the question, is he still a gun? Big difference between someone priced at 51 who you expect to hit 55 vs someone priced at 44 who you expect to score 48. If they're not a gun and not making much money it's a poor pick. There's probably some merit in picking him depending on how undervalued you think he is, but not an insta pick.
Mulvy wrote:
Think I'm with MS on this one. Yes his price has been reduced accordingly and yes he is undervalued, but if a gun is undervalued by a few points that's a good pick. But the nerf means he might not even break 50 which begs the question, is he still a gun? Big difference between someone priced at 51 who you expect to hit 55 vs someone priced at 44 who you expect to score 48. If they're not a gun and not making much money it's a poor pick. There's probably some merit in picking him depending on how undervalued you think he is, but not an insta pick.