mattnz wrote:
They already took a Warriors discard on the wing last season and have one of the best wingers in the comp on the other side.
Very debatable...
NRL Fantasy Fanatics - A place for discussion of NRL Fantasy / Virtual Sports / Super Coach and other Fantasy Sports
mattnz wrote:
They already took a Warriors discard on the wing last season and have one of the best wingers in the comp on the other side.
my tv broke wrote:Sounds like Rev has trained the house down
Well done
Chewie wrote:
Surely the Tigers can do with a player like Oates
my tv broke wrote:Sounds like Rev has trained the house down
Well done
Ponga Yeo the Mann wrote:
What position is he? I need another mid
Londonbunny wrote:@Snatchpato thanks. Worry about Harris not playing for first half of season and taking up replacement space? Or is this a common myth?
ShadowSabre wrote:On the Burton front - with near on 30% ownership, if he does start strong and kill it, it could be really hard to recover from that. Lot's will avoid picking him on principle and that could be season ending.
On the other hand if you avoid the majority and he stinks it up, then you have a massive leg up.
Damn, writing this up and I am still no closer to whether I pick him or not...
rhinoceroo wrote:
Having just watched another old Lolo highlights package, the thing you forget is that the guy was *fast* as well as having the footwork and strength. If shedding a few pounds brings back that acceleration it's linebreak city. (Caveat - I'm a sucker for highlights videos https://youtu.be/GpjnXSn7gR0 )
Fortitude wrote:Tapine > uto.
This concludes my lesson on gut feel pick for mids
mattnz wrote:
I think you will find Granville on the bench, like every round he wasn't in the starting side last season. Provides hooker cover and multiple backline positions as well.
The Dolphin Conspiracies wrote:
I can't see them having both Granville and Cotter on the bench
mintotheimmortal wrote:
Gonna go back to JFH?
Thought I might’ve got some breathing room from you but nope stuck in the same league again I think
The Dolphin Conspiracies wrote:
I can't see them having both Granville and Cotter on the bench, that would be overkill. Word is that Granville is out of favour in any case. There are so many Cowboys forwards in contention as well. Why would the include two bench HOKs?